no.you just cannot fathom the intricacies of well worded arguments, therefore you cannot interpret what you read. there have been thousands of words written about this cheater's use of steroids and alex ariza. just do not cross words with me. if you haven't noticed you get owned, destroyed, mangled and embarrassed every time you do.
No credible circumstantial evidence has ever come up about Pacquiao's PED usage. There is no IV, there is no failed test, there is no reliable sources showing PED usage. The only thing you have is Pacquiao's beserk workrate and his ability to smash much larger fighters into the ground. Which is a result of his training. Not PED's. Just because you gassed out after the first round doesn't mean everybody else does. And just because you folded anytime you fought a guy with a 1 pound weight advantage doesn't mean everybody else does.
and what would YOU know about any of this, you lazy wannabe loser? have YOU ever even JOGGED?? he turned down 40+ million because he said he feared needles. yeah. you don't believe that yourself and YOU have the excuse of being stupid and under educated. so shaddap and talk to other pacroid fans you cannot argue with truth. which is what i am. begone poverty enfused pactrd
I make a good salary. I have a bachelor's degree. And I'm in shape and able to go rounds. No I cannot throw 1000 power shots and keep going beserk. But I'm not a professional boxer. That's their job. That's all they do.
There is no Henry Armstrong of this or any other era since Armstrong retired. Those elite ATG fighters have some ridiculous resumes. In the case of Armstrong, the guy fought nearly 200 times and was a very tough man to beat in his prime. He had a few years in his prime where he was fighting over 15 times a year. Obviously everyone knows that he was the champion of 3 divisions and could've been the champ at MW as well (close loss to the champ at 160.) There was only 1 champ per division back than, so he was the lineal champion of the FW division and was able to win titles at LW and WW as well (during a time when no super/junior divisions really existed in the sport.) He was the true champion of 3 of the original 8 weight classes in boxing. That's almost half. We're not going to see anything like that record ever again.
are you as inept at ...whatever you do as you are in your boxing observations? because ydksab. and if you are THIS inept at work...-IF you are working in whatever you paid to get graduated in- then you must be underpaid as well
I make twice as much money as the average American worker. Which considering most people are lazy, uneducated and underskilled isn't saying all that much. But I'm 24 and by the time I'm 35 I'll be swimming in cash if I keep up my career trajectory.
btw a bachelor's degree is only as good as whomever graduated from it. i.e. that paper is worthless if you cannot produce. and there are a LOT of poor graduates everywhere. ring a bell?
yeah, say that a LOT because along with all the other childish garbage you have said here...and it's a LOT, you don't believe that yourself. if you can lie about pacroid...well you can DEFINITELY lie about yourself. your previous posts reveal that you are not intellectually above average. and you can boast about laziness all you want because there are none here that can attest to your work ethic...or lack thereof.
That paper is something that is required by over 60 percent of job openings in America. Sixty ****ing percent. Many jobs out there right now won't even look at you anymore without one. You're either a skilled tradesman or an educated professional. Or you're ****ed. That's how the modern economy is today. We're no longer in manufacturing or farming. It's an information based economy. And I'm damn glad I have a degree because without one I'd be eating peanut butter and jelly every night for dinner.
I don't care if you've boxed, you were clearly awful and don't have a brain for it. The official medical opinion was that Pacquiao had a torn rotator cuff. Deal with it.
I have. You posting hysterical emoticons doesn't help your case, all it shows is that my words make you emotional. You're on the back foot. I didn't say that. The quality is undoubtedly better than Carpentier's era, though. I wasn't talking about Georges' pre-prime losses. I was saying that Pacquiao was successful from Flyweight to Light Middelweight in an unprecedented way, a way that Georges was not even close to reaching. You complain like a little girl, saying Pac was knocked out a few times before age of 18 (which was pre-prime, by the way) I simply replied that Georges was knocked out 5 times before he was 18. You're the one who turned it into a game of numbers. I'm done discussing with you. You are clueless.
and yet i have demonstrated a CLEAR intellectual advantage over you. i know...that doesn't mean much with you having an IQ of 9. what is an "official medical OPINION"? you are not worth my time. jump off a bridge.