The Hopkins /Calzaghe debate once and for all....

Agreed. I go for quality over quantity, others don't, the subject has been exhausted on this forum.

 

one shot a round??? if the other guy doesn't open up we have no fight!!!
try it with your brother or sparring partner and see the outcome both of you just fart around the ring looking for one shot when the other guy throw a punch!!

thats why the rule came in to give the agresser the benefit of the doubt as they throw more caution to the wind and may get tagged -but at least they are willing to make a fight. I think capzaghe threw enough punches to win the round see my earlier post.

 

Hopkins won. There is no debate. Only arguments.

You can cut it with a razor or just watch the ****ing thing. I have. Hopkins won.

 

Effective aggression is what it's all about. I don't know why so many people tend to leave the effective part out.

 

calzaghe did make hopkins look like an amateur but hopkins also made joe look **** too.
wrong stlyes to clash.
both could not get anything over the other.
​

 

Non' Calzaghe Won..... there 'is' only debate and arguments.
The result is recorded..

 

san rael - i disagree, watch it again i mean the compu box numbers dnt lie!!
but hey u can disagree i have no problem with that.

Calzaghe won, plain and simple, BHOP just got on his bike and looked for the right hand as soon as calzaghe threw a punch!

 

The record... The "record" says alot ****, doesn't it? :shock:

:blood

 

well it depends on the fight, if the other has a style who is only walking around looking for one punch a round and waiting to hit the other guy as soon as they throw a punch its hard to be effective isn't it? without getting hit in the process as your being agressive and making the fight.

Bad style match up to be honest.

 

The record will read "It was a close,difficult clash of styles that resulted in a split decision which Calzaghe won...."
Doesn't sound like **** to me

 

:yep Compubox lies every time.

 

What is this, the day after? Fill in the rest about Calzaghe DUCKING the rematch dammmmnit.

 

:nod

 

He didn't deserve a rematch after his poor behaviour in the first fight and apart from that it was ****.
There was nothing to suggest the rematch would have been any different and Hopkins ****ed it up with the white boy comment.
It's all his own fault........

 

Bernard 'Lost to a white boy' Hopkins :yep:good