The IBF: Your opinion on them?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Brixton Bomber, Feb 14, 2016.


  1. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,110
    Sep 21, 2013
    For me, they are the biggest joke of all the governing bodies.

    WBC

    WBA



    WBO











    IBF.

    That's how I see it.
     
  2. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,095
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004
    1 NOT RATED
    2 NOT RATED
    3 Erkan Teper Germany
    4 Anthony Joshua England
    5 Carlos Takam France
    6 Joshua Parker New Zealand
    7 Vyacheslav Glazkov Ukraine
    8 Steve Cunningham United States
    9 Andy Ruiz Mexico
    10 Bermane Stiverne Haiti
    11 Kubrat Pulev Bulgaria
    12 Robert Helenius Finland
    13 Derek Chisora Zimbabwe
    14 Alexander Ustinov Russian Federation
    15 Dominic Breazeale United States

    out of curiosity just looked up there current heavy rankings
    martin champ
     
  3. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    And is that because Joshua is going to become the latest Eddie Hearn fighter to become world champ after Brook, DeGale and Selby and as we know, Eddie Hearn introduced your mum to butt stuff?


    A Yank like you probably loves the WBA having 3 champions per weight class and doing stuff like promoting Broner (coming off a loss to Kell Brook's son) beating a guy who hasn't fought in two years (also coming off a loss) to Super Champion :hi::hi::hi:

    And before you start showing butthurt about Brook's mando's what we all know that's coming, bare in mind Bundu, Khan, Bradley, Porter, Alexander and Ali all turned down final eliminators. :hi::hi:
     
  4. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,095
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004
    1 and 2 you have to pay for
    3 teper has been found cheating a month or so ago and is still ranked
    4 joshua has not fought enough top 50 opposition to be ranked so high
    5 takam got kod by povetkin who is not ranked at all
    6 parker good prospect but has not beaten anyone
    7 glaskov on paper because of his opposition and his injury might be fair but IMO he is not a top 10 figher h2h and is to small and has no power foir the better fighters
    8/cunningham lost to fury by ko and drew with light heavy oap tarver
    9/andy ruiz ? why
    10 stiverne - sluggish v rossy but got the win
    11/ pulev = should be rated in top 5
    12 =helnius -**** or get off the pot
    13 chisrora =zimbabwe ? because of a drug ban / he is not a top 15 fighter -good trialhorse
    14 ustinov =on the downslope quit v pulev.
    15 breazale =

    no ortiz whats he black or something.
    no wlad only ruled the division for 10 years
    no povetkin WTF
     
  5. ryuken87

    ryuken87 Active Member Full Member

    1,468
    877
    Mar 8, 2014
    They enforce mandatories which is a good thing. Unfortunaately it seems rather easy to become a mandatory with the IBF.

    Overall I prefer them to the other organisations.
     
  6. LoRd_inFamousX1

    LoRd_inFamousX1 Lord of the Square Rings Full Member

    4,133
    4
    May 18, 2012
    They don't like to unify the belts and the best rarely holds their title. It's a joke of a title.
     
  7. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,095
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004
    they enforce mandatorys simply because you have to actually pay them to get a mandatory slot.
    they would then have to pay the money back if they did not.

    you do not even have to be ranked in there top 15 to get a mandatory eliminator just have the money ready.
     
  8. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,888
    17,175
    Jul 19, 2004
    The IBF, WBC, WBA, and WBO are all corrupt the core. They are all equally bad and their antics, both individually and collectively, continue to do the sport far more harm than good.

    They all suck!

    :smoke
     
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,888
    17,175
    Jul 19, 2004
    :yep
     
  10. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,110
    Sep 21, 2013
    :good:good:good:good
     
  11. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013

    If anything, the IBF are the ones who stick to their rules. Glazkov earned his mandatory shot, and they made sure he got it, even though they would've made a fortune being invovled in the Fury v Klitschko rematch. Would the WBA or WBC turn down that kind of money? :think
     
  12. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    When have they turned down someone who wanted to unify? A recent example s they was happy for GGG to fight another champion but if not he had to fight his mando
     
  13. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,110
    Sep 21, 2013
  14. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,888
    17,175
    Jul 19, 2004
    :nut