Disclaimer:These aren't my actual thoughts and ideas, this is just me making fun of that one boxing fan I'm sure we've all bumped into..and regretted it at one in time. Please do feel free to tag along and chip in *ahem* Boxers whom I haven't heard of are bums, no exception. I'm totally gonna disregard their accomplishments that I could have easily found out with just a little bit of research. Any Boxer whose power does not meet my expectations is a feather fist, I mean what boxer doesn't knock every opponent out? That's what boxing is all about. Any boxer who gets Knockedout at any point in his career has a glass jaw, no exception. I don't care if they were only KO'd by big punchers if they hit the canvas they're weak.Finally every boxer I don't like is overrated, I don't care about how they preformed in the ring or about their skill. or the replay value of their bouts or how entertaining they are/were if people speak so highly of them they're clearly overrated.
ahahah almost everyone here is predictable man. I can count on one hand the decent posters I've bumped into here
There is about 5 guys at work that watch boxing, one of them is pretty terrible when a fighter loses. "Bruh, he terrible, he garbage.". I tried to talk to him about it, explain that 4th best in his weightclass isn't garbage, just Floyd and Manny are great. "Nah Bruh, you ant listening to me, they garbage, trash, they cant fight." This particular friend loved Broner, so he took it really hard when Broner lost... and went twice as hard in the garbage stuff on him.
Yeah there are always those Brand New boxing fans. But I think we can all agree the most annoying fans are the ones who flock to the Mayweather vs Pacman fight. :roll:
i cant join a ******* ***** thread, i can post any message on any thread but those threads i avoid like the plague.
You also forgot the part where a fighter from the past will always for some indiscernible reason beat a contemporary fighter. Skills, athleticism, size, and other factors don't matter, as long that fighter comes from a previous era, they should always be given benefit of the doubt.
Oh and let's toss around the word "One dimensional" simply because we've seen oh..maybe three matches at the most where they didn't really display their skill like they should have. or Let's mouth off and say "haha ______ totally schooled ______" as if it isn't totally expected when its a complete mismatch from the jump totally disregarding styles make fights. But yes let's mock the brawler for being out-pointed by a pure boxer as if that's never happened before :roll: lol
Calling great fighters cowards or any fighter for that matter without ever having the balls to step foot in the ring themselves
"Best Ever" or G.O.A.T being thrown around alot these days, and many actually believe them, like rats following the pied piper. Of course, very few, ahem, like a certain fighter from Louisville, actually prove themselves to be great . And for that reason I have to give the old timers the benefit of the doubt. They been there done that, as where many today haven't gone anywhere or done anything.
I also despise those who try and take a fighters legacy away because of their personal lives outside of the ring..*cough* Mike Tyson
I sincerely hate..truly..deeply loathe those "chin checker" nut stains dwelling ESB There is seriously no reason for that sh!t.