The Italian judge scored the last two rounds for Froch??!?!

the judge found himself in a hole giving dirrell too many early rounds and hav to catch up so he won't get his ass kicked. Dirrell turned it up late too.

 

The fact that he gave Froch the 11th makes things seem very fishy.

 

I suspect that often a judges opinion of who is winning the fight overall can seriously affect his decisions on scoring. And so I found that on many occasions the last rounds are not simply judged based on who did the better work in the round. Its just a thoery that I have when it comes to scorring. I wouldn't think it was much of a stretch that the Italian judge just said to himself if the rounds are close i'm giving it to Froch because I don't like the way this guy has been fighting.

I know here come the cry babies thats not how the sport is supposed to be judged. Our guy go robbed. Yes I know I agree. But the dude needs to fight like a man before I'll care.

 

It could be that the judge mixed up the scorecards sides and gave Dirrells round to Froch, and Frochs round to Dirrell.

That would mean, he had the whole outcome reversed (-> Dirrell would have won a SD). Happened before, when some shitty judge gave Oscar Sturms best round to have Oscar winning. Albeit, he just CLAIMED he mixed the sides up.

 

Agreed.. the 11th was one of Dirrells best rounds..

 

Thats a bit suspicious alright

 

erm.........scoring the 11th for Froch didn't make any difference to the result so stop bitching like a little girl for ****s sake.

Even Dirrell admitted Froch won the 12th.

Epic fail

 

The 12th can easily be disputed.

The decision was fair.

 

It might be able to be disputed but do you truly believe Froch won the 12th?

 

a bit like the score card you posted giving Froch the 11th.. atsch

 

Philla (Ask Dirrell he said Froch won the last round. ) lol.

 

David really score the 11th round to Froch????