The Joe Calzaghe Deception, the night Bernard Hopkins was robbed

These videos are biased rubbish from a Hopkins fan.

There is no mention of aggression, pressure, workrate, speed, movement, defense - the general tatics and performance of BOTH fighters. Only Hopkins' effective punches are highlighted and applauded. There are many clean good shots from Calzaghe that are not acknowledged. The only time the video maker draws attention to Joe's shots is when they are so obivious that he cannot avoid doing so. Even then he is quite sarcastic and disrepectful.

Also at times some of the action is called to be in Hopkins favour, when in fact it clearly favoured Joe.

I thought these videos were going to contain intelligent, objective commentary similar to that of DWYER on YouTube. Sadly we only get garbage from a fanboy.

 

so you prefer the fighter who hugs the washerwoman all night rather than try and mix it with her?

 

lol did you really expect people to watch a 1 hour and 20 minute long analysis of a fight that a lot of people found boring?

 

:good

 

At least he's not an idiot Calzaghe nuthugger like everyone else from Wales. He judged the fight on a different criteria than I did and had Hopkins winning. Nothing wrong with that.

 

I watched rounds 1-10 in full and stopped watching during RD 11. My opinion is above.

What Tyson and Froch thought is irrelavent. The video is made to clearly FAVOUR Hopkins.

Enzo told Joe he needed to stop Hopkins as an attempt to pump him up, and encourage him to go all out.

 

Absolutely sterling posting Headbanger. A true delight to behold such a high calibre of poster pwning minions with consumate ease. Salutations. :happy:happyarty:freddy:banana

 

To the OP, i watched about 10 minutes of it and stopped. I realize that are completely biased. I thought maybe i would see a good case for why Hopkins was robbed but it was just a very biased piece in favor of Hopkins. You can do this type of stuff for many fights.

 

The fact that the entire fight is covered makes it even more shocking. Throughout the whole 12 rounds

• the video maker refuses to recognise good work from Calzaghe.
• over emphasises work by Hopkins.
• refuses to dicuss the pressure and workrate of Calzaghe.
• applauds Hopkins inside work but does not mention his illegal tactics.
• Does not mention the performance of Cortez.

The video only discusses punching but I thought the 'sweet-science' of boxing consisted of more than this.

There are some good observations, but the text is clearly disrepectful to Calzaghe. Go and watch DWYER'S videos that's how you give honest and fair analysis.

 

There is no point watching the video because it's clearly biased.

I watched the fight a few times and i tried to give it to Hopkins but just couldn't find enough rounds to give him. Calzaghe pressed the fight. Hopkins had a great start but he did very little from 2-12.

 

Forget about what Hopkins didn't do, what did calfaggi do to deserve victory, besides chase after Hopkins with his arms flailing tripping over himself missing most of his "punches"? Do not let your bias against Hopkins cause a bias in favor of calfaggi.

DRAW.

 

Just did, Calzaghe won 115-112.