'The King of England' Carl Froch is one of the most HOF worthy fighters in boxing

you really seem to like making a Tit out of yourself don't you?

Dawson, the zombie, has a better resume than Froch?? take your addiction for glue elsewhere. :-(

 

all day, every day. Dawson is nowhere near to the accomplishments of Froch. only an idiot would think so. :deal

 

yes, Taylor did beat Hopkins, but it still doesn't make him the better fighter overall. no way.

i rate Pascal a level below Dawson. the rest i agree with.

 

Froch is overrated, but the monthly hype job that America comes up with, like they're the bees knees, is worthy?

Froch is legit. to say otherwise is messed up.

get back to that future ATG Thurman, that's more your level. leave the real fighters to those that know.

 

and neither was Hearns the best at any of the weights he fought in. but he's still one of the best in history.

Ward didn't dominate either. he won, but Froch was there all the way.

 

Froch might lose H2H to Ward but has a better resume and is the greater fighter just like Hopkins loses H2H to Calzaghe but is the greater fighter with the better resume.

 

I agree Froch is a HOF fighter no doubt.

 

Yes, yes he does...

 

Get.....to fu¢k. It aint what it is.

 

Dawson simply has the better victories...

 

initially vegas was mooted as a potential venue, but then ward sabotaged his own career. but for the hard of thinking, i repeat, WARD AIN'T FIGHTING! i'm glad i'm not a fan of a talented champ who makes poxy excuses instead of defences. imagine having to regurgitate his bull**** on the internet instead of enjoying his career. ****'s game.

lucky his career amounts to so much more than that, then. although you need to reel it in a bit. it was a creditable, technically proficient points victory and nothing more. nobody was beaten up that night.