The Klitschko brothers will be sorely missed in 10 years time

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slyk, Mar 8, 2012.


  1. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,436
    141
    Feb 27, 2008
    Vitali will be missed, his fights were generally entertaining even in the one sided beatings he was giving and he is a real character outside the ring (the Briggs pre fight photos and the face off interview with Chisora).

    Wlad is a completely different case. Yes he dominates and he has a legacy but his fights are nearly unwatchable. Only Germans and E.Europeans will miss him. The best thing Wlad can offer at the moment is being KOed cold by an up and coming great fighter and creating a superstar from that loss.
     
  2. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    i dont think they will be missed by americans at all.
     
  3. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    I think Wlad will be missed far more than Vitali. He's the better boxer, has a better personality and a wider appeal. He's in the Tunney and Patterson mould though, so likely won't be remembered as past champions.

    It all depends on who rules the next era of boxing. If they're boring, the Klitschkos will be talked about with a lot of praise. If the next dominant heavyweight is exciting, the Klitschkos will likely become a footnote. I can't imagine they will be talking about with much praise in 15-20 years, much like how Abraham's MW reign won't be remembered as much as Pavlik's was.

    Hopefully the next dominant heavyweight is David Price. He seemed very friendly with Manny Steward, so maybe they'll work together. Steward seemed impressed.
     
  4. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    No they won't be remembered like that.

    Just like we don't remember Holmes, Marciano or Louis like that neither. Because their eras were just as 'bad' as today's.
     
  5. fortress

    fortress Member Full Member

    168
    0
    Feb 16, 2012
    bottom line is you dont know jack**** about boxing. the klitschko opponents arent ****, the klitschkos make them look like ****. look at guys like chagaev, ibragimov, byrd: they have great technical skills and their amateur careers prove that.
     
  6. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    :patsch
     
  7. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    Where are those super skilled heavys now? Byrd fair enough. What about ibragimov or chagaev? Where did these super talented heavyweights go after losing to the klits?? I suppose your gonna say the brothers ruined them. :lol:

    The bottom line is, heavyweights of this era come in overweight. Once they are in the ring, they seem to have absolutely no game plan. After round 2 they seem to be out of ideas, and don't bother trying anything else. A lot of them lack basic fundamentals. Most of them flat out disappear after losing. But yes this is a fantastic era of heavyweights.
     
  8. Larryboys

    Larryboys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,648
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    They may not be setting the world alight excitement wise but they're the only thing giving the heavyweight division any respectability. Big crowds, fights that are treated as big deals, and talented enough to have been contenders in any previous era which you can't say about anyone else in the division. Lets say they retire tommorow, what have we got left? Alexander Povetkin vs Kubrat Pulev or Tyson Fury.
     
  9. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    The only people who won't miss the Klitschkos are the British, blacks, self loathing white guys, capitalists, jealous folk, ugly people and mum's basement dwellers.

    Everyone else will miss them desperately.
     
  10. treeve

    treeve Active Member Full Member

    1,168
    0
    Jan 9, 2010

    Wow i guess that puts you in an Awkward position eh?:rasta
     
  11. Povetkinfan

    Povetkinfan Member Full Member

    499
    3
    Jan 26, 2008
    Slyk makes a very good point about the quality of boxing eras being subjective, and that fans 'opinions' are often manufactured by their countries media.

    For example, in the UK most people I spoke to prior to the Wlad Haye fight [those who were not out-and-out boxing fans that is] were convinced Haye would dominate Wlad and win by KO. I'd hear comments such as Wlad is 'robotic and slow' that they'd heard from newspaer articles and sky sports pundits.

    If you keep repeating lies often enough you can brainwash people into believing anything. How else would the Republicans keep getting back into power in the US?
     
  12. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    12
    Sep 24, 2011

    They weren't, their eras whilst weak, were better than this one. The current era is disgraceful, did you see Wlad-Mormeck!? I'd rather watch Marciano-Walcott, Louis-Schmeling, Holmes-Norton than any fight Wlad has been in.
     
  13. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    No they weren't. Olympic gold medalist Rademacher got a HW title shot with *ZERO* pro fights. Louis was fighting guys that were reminiscent of dock workers that looked like Eric Esch. Holmes was feasting on green guys with 15 pro fights or old men.

    Sound familiar?

    You're absolutely clueless if you think the HW talent of 2002 - 2012 is any worse than the 30s, 50s or 80s.
     
  14. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    This content is protected
     
  15. This content is protected


    This fat 50 year old **** actually became the man at Heavyweight during the "Golden era" of the 90's and you're complaining about the weights of this era?

    :lol:

    Clown.