The Klitschko contract terms

Yeah and if Haye would give these terms to the Klits and they accept he would be your big cool daddy, who cheats the Klits, you clown...you will be one of these who have to be very silent after June 20....

 

Freakin stupid...Whoever made that contract is an idiot!! No wonder why Haye didn't wanna sign...If the original post in this thread is the truth than fu34 both Klitchkos...WHY SHOULD HAYE BE FORCED TO FIGHT VITALI IF HE BEATS WLAD....WLAD IS A *****..WLAD SHOULD WIN THIS FIGHT AND THE ONLY REMATCH CLAUSE IN THE CONTRACT SHOULD BE THAT IF HAYE WINS HE HAS TO FIGHT WLAD AGAIN..VITALI AIN'T GOT **** TO DO WITH ANYTHING...

 

:good

 

Everyone seems to forget.. Haye wanted a fight with Vitali as well...

Once again:
Haye beats Wlad $$$$$

Haye rematch with Wlad $$$$$$$

Haye unification with Vitali $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Not a bad deal for Haye if you ask me... which would Haye want to fight.. another Klitschko if he wins $$$$$$$$$$$$$ or a fight with lets say Povetkin $$

Look at the business end of it guys. Haye is smart for doing this. If he wins, he is set for life:deal

 

I support Wlad but I cant help myself but IM begin to wonder why if Haye HIMSELF wanted those rematch clauses waited and waited so long to sign the deal????:huh

something to do with hyping, making with bigger or?:huh

 

big problem was what was to be put into the pot from both fighters, then split per %...

Haye didnt/Couldn't/ woul;dn't secure the arena in London, then the monies he promised from Sentanta was less then he said...

so they talked again....and came up with a deal based on who was bringing what to the table

Options and % was never the problem, It was who brings what and how thewy could split it to equal the %'s already agreed to

 

I hope I'm wrong but I think Wlad'l' stop him sooner than that.
Anyway, what I wanted to ask was, if Haye loses does he get a rematch? I'm guessing not

 

I'm sure all of the governing bodies are quite content for the Klitschko's to save them all of the hassle of actually being involved in deciding who fights for their belts. :think:nono

 

i actually dont know, but I would guess no. Most challengers dont get a rematch clause... maybe a rematch but I dought its in the contract

 

The contract will produce all sorts of implications but overall it could produce a few big money fights, which is what the HW division needs.

 

fighting 3 big fights in a row is only half the story and already bad enoughprime Ali Tyson or Lewis would struggle with that,reminds me of when you might have a bet with a mate and after he loses he just keeps saying double or nothing double of nothing until he wins.But the actual worst part of this contract is if Haye wins he will have to relenquish the titles he just won and become the challenger for Vits title,allowing Vlad to win his titles back against someone else,its 3rd world thinking,because they came from nothing they are always worried about going back to that so will do anything to avoid it,which includes ****ing up heavyweight boxing

 

Haye wants to make money. If he wins he will get a chance to do it with the re-matches.