The klitschko would have beat muhammad Ali

I've always thought Wlad would be a tough fight for Ali. But I would still take him to win a clear enough decision. He would be landing the cleaner and crisp shots and that would be the difference.

He would **** up Vitali though. Make him look stupid and cut him to pieces.

 

atsch

 

Funny you felt the need to throw out that little list there homeboy. Lol :roll: But this thread was about Ali v.s the Klitschko's. Whether you like it or not the Klitschko's would have been a challenge to ANY heavyweight in any era. They're both big, strong, skilled, and hit very ****ing hard. But hey ...think what ya want. :good

 

Dimitrenko, just moments ago, can count himself lucky to get the decision against Michael Sprott. Eddie Chambers got bigged up for edging out Dimitrenko as Dimitrenko is one of todays top contenders. Chambers is considered one of Wlads best wins and one of the most skilled fighters Wlad has fought.

This should put the skill level of todays heavyweights into perspective.

 

Eddie Chambers is a fat, jelly-rolled, piece of ****. He and Arreola should fight for a spot at the buffet.

 

Yep, Chambers isn't even a natural heavyweight. The guy is 6ft, a fat 200lbs, slow and not really that skilled and it still took Wlad till the 12th round to stop him.

Yet according to some people on here Wlad would destroy Ali just beacuse Wlad is taller and heavier

 

Nobody says Wlad would KO Ali but he would win a comfortable UD. It mostly comes down to styles although size is obviously a factor.

 

atsch

I could truly believe that the moon is made of goat smegma and rainbows. And like you I will not tell you why. Unlike you, I would be unsurprised if anyone would dare question my belief.

Boxing is about a little more than just size....I really do believe that! :roll:

 

holy zombie jesus wtf
ron jeremy ko1 klits

 

joe frazier was smaller slower and only had one eye. still beat ali.

Wlad is a terrible matchup for Ali. Bigger, stronger, calculated with very good speed.

this aint a Dimitrenko we're talking about. Wlad has ATG boxing skill. he would beat Ali:deal

 

Ali is vastly OVERRATED, and so are most other boxers from past generations. It's called nostalgia, and it's human nature to believe things from the past that you enjoyed, are better than they are today.

Boxing, like all sports, has undergone tremendous change in the last 40-years. European nations are now able to compete, and many times beat, the best the US has to offer, in sports the US used to completely dominate.

Look at the number of European players in the NBA now compared to 40-years ago.

Look at the track and field records from 40-years ago, and look at how many of those records still stand today.

A big problem is that since the US isn't the leader in the showcase division of boxing today (heavyweights), people assume boxing is dead, that the fighters are bums, etc.. That's all media BS. They are simply trashing what they can't beat.

All sports advance, athletes get bigger, stronger, faster, and more skilled.
The world does not stop for boxing, it advances just like all other sports.

Again: The world does NOT stop for boxing.

 

Joe Frazier was 200 to 210lbs, in supreme shape and as solid as a rock. Eddie Chambers is maybe an inch or two taller and fat at the same weight range.

As for speed, well just lol.

 

the reason the foolish thread starter stated that Foreman was beating ALI was because thats the impression that movies give

its the most famous fight ever

this fool never even saw it

ignore him

 

Frazier would ko Chambers in 5 rounds, do not compare them!!!
Wlad is fast but he would look very slow against Ali and would not be able to find him(he didnt find Haye all that well), plus Wlads safety style would make him lose the fight, he didnt throw 10 right hands against Haye and you cant beat Ali on left jab no way, K brothers are good but you watch them against these bums and imagine that they are unbeatable!!! Seriously Kingpin Johnson, Chambers, Sosnowski, fat Briggs fat Areola talented but fat Solis would not get a chance to fight champion in 70s. And ali wasnt small he was 191 cm Sanders was 194 but Ali has reach of 203cm while Sanders has 196cm reach, and lets not compare skill level of these two!!!
To MORONS that only write here weight and size factor by that standard i think Valuev is best heavyweight ever!!!

 

N

o

t


t

h

i

s


s

h

i

t



a

g

a

i

n


I


w

a

s

h

o

p

i

n

g


t

h

a

t


f

l

o

y

d



w

i

n


o

v

e

r



O

r

t

i

z


w

o

u

l

d



k

i

l

l


t

h

i

s


g

a

r

b

a

g

e
.


g

o

d



I

h

a

t

e

k

l

i

t

l

i

c

k

e

r
!