the klitschkos would dominate any era in heavyweight boxing apart from lennox lewis's

Given the problems Hayes speed gave Wlad lol at anyone ever suggesting Wlad would beat Ali

LOOLOLOLOL

 

Finally, I hater that tries with argumentation. Something you actually can reply on.

First off: Wlad had three losses. One of them he avenged himself. Vitali got to Corrie Sanders first simply because he climbed the rankings faster. I cant really see a big problem in that.

Dude, Mike Tyson was KO'd by Kevin Mcbride. Thats as bad as it gets. Roy Jones gets KO'd every time the wind changes direction.

There where lots of bums hanging around in the 70's. But with enough chances even bums might score a fluke win against great fighters. Because every now and then even great fighters slips up. And since these bums lost and won against ATG, they get hyped up. In our era they would be nothing but typical Klitschko fodder.

Even guys like Ali and Tyson would have a hard time with the brothers.

 

Oh yes the size thing again.

It took Wlad 12 uneventful rounds to get Eddie Chambers out of their. Eddie Chambers is just a fat Lightheavyweight, short, slow as a sloth and fairly unskilled. He is however one of the better opponents Wlad has faced, which says a lot.

Now imagine what the likes of Ali, Frazer and Foreman would do to Chambers.

 

If a guy like Jimmy Young could give Ali trouble and beat Foreman I can see Chambers doing the same.:think Young lost to club fighter Randy Neumann....Chambers has never lost to anyone but two of the best around.....

 

:rofl

George Foreman was only stopped once, and that was when he gassed against Ali.

Samil Sam stopped Williams quicker than Vitali did. Williams also got knocked out by Audley Harrison. Audley ****ing Harrison for christ sake.

You are joking with this statement, right?

 

klitchkos are good, no doubt about it but i rate vitali far higher than wladmir and he still got smashed up by a fat lennox lewis. vitali might be slightly less skillful than his brother but he has a bigger heart, tremendous chin and more power. anyway its hard to say who would beat vitali going back i think foreman would, larry holmes would of outclassed him and tyson could get the knockout.

 

I think his point is foreman is better than williams :good

 

fukin hell guys, just sitting back and reading that comment out loud.

what the hell has ahppened to the general forum whereby poeple have to jutsify foreman being greater than danny williams atsch

 

How do I see wlad v all the number 1's?

W sullivan
W corbett
W fitz
W jeffries
W hart
W burns
W johnson
W jeanette
W langford
W mcvey
W wills
W willard
L dempsey
W tunney
W schmelling
W sharkey
W carnera
W baer
W braddock
L louis
W charles
W walcot
W marciano
W patterson
L liston
W ingo
L ali
L frazier
L foreman
W norton
L holmes
W spinks
L tyson
W douglas
W holyfield
W bowe
W moorer
L lewis
W rahman
W vitali
W byrd

So I have him going 32-9 against past top dogs.

Pretty impressive. Vitali comes off worse in a comparison but that's to be expected really.

 

It is possible but improbable. I think the size helps them with guys like Rahman and all that, but guys like Tyson and Ali would have found ways to beat them. But I sense you are mentioning them dominating eras because they are so much bigger than all the other eras. Which has some truth to it. Size is important, but a really great fighter can overcome size if he is fighting someone not as great. I don't think the Klitchkos are legit. all time greats. I think very very good skills and huge size overcomes a lot.

 

You obviously haven't been here that long.

 

Apparently George Foreman was no better than Danny Williams

 

Let's just say that rematches are ordered if "result of the fight was controversial or irregular". This is the official definition