The lack of impartiality of Sky Sports is sickening

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by gooners!!, Sep 13, 2011.


  1. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Why would you? If the presenters have something interesting to say, and are good at their job, it wouldn't be an issue imo. Who's opinion would you rather listen to about Boxing, Steve Bunce, Johnny Nelson, or Al Bernstein? I mean, like its better listening to the biased circle jerk between Sky and the fans.


    I'm not strategically anything imo( a purist), I'm the default person who just dont like bias, I mean, give your OWN opinion cause that is how you see it, not because that is how you perceive people want to it putting across, cause your assumption is gonna be wrong for some people.

    Well some think HBO are biased, and maybe they are in degrees, but they are way! less biased than Skysports imo, but still seem to do alright for themselves.

    I cant believe Brits arguing against the bias because they enjoy it, how one dimensional and predictable have you gotta be as human being? Is there any wonder fighters like Haye insult the fans intelligence by taking advantage of their support/nationalism by giving them the Audley Harrison fight.
     
  2. chatty

    chatty Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,413
    1,067
    Aug 18, 2009
    I like the F1 commentary, they generally are biased and want the Brits to win but they don't overdo it and are happy to talk about other nations strategy's and how they could do better etc etc
     
  3. insider

    insider Journeyman Opponent Full Member

    446
    0
    Jul 9, 2011
    Do you think Ringside is a better show than the sadly missed Bunce Boxing Hour on Setanta?