Why some people still put in lights losers like Taylor and Direll and, moreover make them standmarks for high rankings position? Affirmation: Taylor ouboxed Froch. SO WHAT, IF HE DID LOSE? And lost not anyhow but by KO?More, The KO of Froch started the end for Taylor. What is important:the fact Taylor was a little ahead on the cards or THE FACT HE LOST? The same with Direll.DIDN`T HE LOSE WITH FROCH?Arguably, but he lost. And who did beat Direll? Abraham by DQ after an entire fight in retreat?Did he won a belt yet?By comparison, BUTE HAS FOUR YEARS AND A HALF OF CHAMPIONSHIP.If he`s so weak why anyone didn`t take his belt yet?
And, by the way, DIRELL NEEDS SOMEONE LIKE BUTE TO PROVES HIMSELF BY A VICTORY NOT THE REVERSE.In the fight with Abraham, as anyone saw, he still could lose by KO.If he wouldn`t have run he would have the chance to have a clear victory against Abraham who, by the way, suffered a a shutout from Froch.So would have not mattered much more anyway. A CLOSE FIGHT WITH FROCH DOESN`T MAKE YOU A STANDMARK IN THE CATEGORY AND SOMEBODY.
Froch on the other hand.... Couple of Romanian boxing commentators who will report live this fight in Romania have been trying to find the gym where "The Cobra" was training actually found out the street and the name of the gym but in the end walked down that street and still could not find it. asking ppl around and nobody wanted to tell them where it is.
Froch says he lost a "very close" fight to Ward.WTF?Was that the same fight I watched.Ward won every round but 2!Froch is clearly delusional.:nut