THE LIST: People who thought Bradley won over Pacquiao.

jmm 3 was different.

watching it live. i thought pacquiao lost.

then when they announced for pac i was surprised. not shocked but surprised.


this fight had a different feel for me.

i just assumed pac won and won big.

i thought the fight was kinda boring and pac half assed it.

but it was like a pace car in a race.

driving not fast , not slow but just enough to consistently be ahead.

that's what this fight felt like. pac half assing but still winning the rounds consistently.

 

How is 115-114 possible in a 10 point must system ? No knock downs or point deductions.:think

 

I had the Bradley fight 8-4 for Pac and the Marquez fight 8-4 Marquez so, same type of decision to me.

 

Are you serious?

 

nah even with the same scores not the same.

because the amount of rounds might be equal but the quality of action to win those rounds aren't.

you feel me?


like you can have 2 fights 120-108 but 1 fight have competitive rounds and the other have none at all.

it's like if basketball only scored per quarter.

2 games won by 1 team 4 quarters to 0 quarters.

but 1 game had 25-21 or 26-22 scores per quarter and the other game had 32-18 or 27-16.

it's different.

 

even rounds.

 

yeah, wow, I posted an article on the first page of the thread explaining it atsch

 

and btw scoring even rounds like the old days is a good way to stop bogus decisions or lopsided decisions.

if judges score close rounds even , then it will all depend on which boxer had the most dominant rounds.

a guy dominating 1 round and a guy barely squeaking by with a close round is pretty much equal right now in boxing.

it shouldn't be.

 

There's no even rounds in a 10 point must system.

 

break it down for me. pls.

 

This content is protected

 

OK, if there's no clear winner, each fighter can get 10 points each, but 115-114 score is not possible if there's no kd or point deductions.