The loser of Ward vs Dirrell will become/be deemed the next American hype job

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Sep 25, 2010.


  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    So what does me calling Froch a limited fighter mean then? I havent said anything so blunt about Ward or Dirrell, but you dont mind that
     
  2. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    true but froch IS a limited fighter:good ward and dirrell aren't hype jobs, just skilled prospects who are fighting. regardless of who wins, they are what they are
     
  3. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    Ward > calzaghe when it is all said and done
     
  4. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    he's got a ways to prove it
     
  5. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    Dirrell was such a skilled fighter he couldnt win against a limited (as you also put) pressure fighter in Froch, and his only noted win is a DQ againsta former MW whos big win was who? So If Ward loses to him it dosent look great, and if Dirrell loses again, where does he go? His level would have been found after all the hype, making him...
     
  6. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    yeah he does but he has the potential to do so . he has already fought way better ompetition than calzaghe at this stage in slappy joes career
     
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    :lol: Troll
     
  8. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    What when Calzaghe had beaten Eubank :patsch:lol:
     
  9. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    yeah im the troll LOL LOL LOL.

    thats like a British boxer calling a crackhead a druggie
     
  10. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    A troll who cant back up his debates without being schooled :lol:. By all means give it a go and Ill Pwn you off here :lol:
     
  11. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    lol wow you are just too cool LOL. i take it you have never boxed. lol thats a given. you know about as much as i do in one finger little boy
    :D :D :D :D
     
  12. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    see, you're WAY underselling dirrell. he fought neck and neck with froch in an ugly fight. and he DOMINATED the co-favourite in the tournament. saying it's a DQ is selling it short: he was owning abraham.

    ward is now the favourite in the tournament and if dirrell loses to him, he's held his own with froch, dominated abraham and found wanting with ward. sure, we found his level. dirrell won't be the best but that doesn't make him hype
     
  13. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    This content is protected


    For bailey and herbzg . the homosexual lovers
     
  14. JSharp3180

    JSharp3180 New Member Full Member

    93
    0
    Jul 5, 2007
    I agree wholeheartedly with Henke67.
     
  15. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,816
    2,958
    Dec 11, 2009
    Your inability to back up facts and debate boxing is disgusting :dead. By not trying to back up your quotes that ive broken down, you have exposed a weak person who throws insults when beaten :lol:.
    The real sign of your weakness is insulting someone who isnt even quoting on this thread. Weak weak weak. :lol: