The loaded list of names, combined with the many fights we missed, is one that makes a strong case for there being one champion in each class. You wouldn't have nearly this many misses if there were one man to target.
Here's a list (not completely exhaustive, by the way) of the most significant fights that took place during the '87-'94 era: 1987: -Sumbu Kalambay v Herol Graham 1 -Sumbu Kalambay v Iran Barkley -Thomas Hearns v Juan Roldan 1988: -Iran Barkley v Thomas Hearns -Sumbu Kalambay v Mike McCallum 1 -Michael Nunn v Frank Tate 1989: -Michael Watson v Nigel Benn -Mike McCallum v Herol Graham -Michael Nunn v Sambu Kalambay -Roberto Duran v Iran Barkley -Michael Nunn v Iran Barkley 1990: -Mike McCallum v Steve Collins -Mike McCallum v Michael Watson -Nigel Benn v Iran Barkley -Chris Eubank v Nigel Benn 1 -Julian Jackson v Herol Graham 1991: -Mike McCallum v Sambu Kalambay 2 -James Toney v Michael Nunn -Chris Eubank v Michael Watson 1 -James Toney v Reggie Johnson -James Toney v Mike McCallum 1 1992: -James Toney v Mike McCallum 2 -Reggie Johnson v Steve Collins -Sumbu Kalambay v Steve Collins -Sumbu Kalambay v Herol Graham 2 1993: -John David Jackson v Reggie Johnson -Roy Jones v Bernard Hopkins 1 -Gerald McClellan v Julian Jackson 1 1994: -Gerald McClellan v Julian Jackson 2 -Jorge Castro v Reggie Johnson 1 -Jorge Castro v John David Jackson -Bernard Hopkins v Segundo Mercado 1 Looking at that list, it doesn't feel like there were too many missed opportunities.
Benn was nowhere near Hagler`s level at 160, no way could Eubank and Watson have beaten Hagler, McCallum beat Watson.
A lot of good prospects who were hyped when Hagler left the game, but few of them lasted long. Michael Nunn and Sumbu Kalambay were the two left standing in 1989, and Nunn destroyed Kalambay in 1 round but fell off after that. There were some good fights around this time but i don't think the era was particularly strong.
In the early to mid 80s s lot of the best 160 lb contenders did fight one another but unfortunately for them there was only one title to go after. But it kind of forced them to fight each other because they couldn't wait around for a title shot. Well Obel could because of his favorite son status with the Latin controlled WBA. And it was good because Hagler often (but not always) would face a guy who had to beat somebody hiigjhly rated to get a crack at him. So we still got to see a lot of good 160 lb. fights that didn't involve Hagler. They just weren't title fights.
Awesome post. Very informative for a fan like me who tends to blow off discussions involving politics and all the behind the scenes string pulling that goes on. It’s probably the one thing I truly, truly hate about the sport. Your last sentence perfectly illustrates why.
So many boxers I liked from this period. Frank Tate, Michael Nunn, Reggie Johnson, Nigel Benn, Mike McCallum. Really deep division. I thought Nunn would dominate a while. Really liked Reggie Johnson because he was such a slick guy. Roy Jones definitely could’ve dominated a while if he’d remained at middle. Always wondered what Hagler would’ve done if he’d beaten Leonard. It’s weird to think of him fighting someone like Michael Olajade or Barkley. He just feels like part of a different era.
Very good point, Saad. There were a lot of high-quality non-title fights in the 80s. Makes me realise that it wasn't a weak era, actually, and it emphasizes how good Hagler really was as many of the contenders would go life and death against each other and then Hagler would blow right threw the winner of those fights. He was just on another level.
Agreed, JT. Hagler would have had zero left to prove and it was only the Leonard fight that made him carry on. Once that was done, so was he. As he showed by retiring even after he lost.