The "Lucky Punch"

Marquez was P4P #3 a few days ago only showed he was extremely overrated after Bradley took him to school. JMM is lucky to get a mention in the top 10 at this point. By getting taken to school by the same fighter that Pacquiao dominated, believe me when I say JMM's legacy has taken a big downfall right before retirement where he needed to be in the first place. :thumbsup

 

:huhmakes no sense, so a fighter who should have been retired takes one of the best fighters in world to a split decision(evan though i thought bradley won clearly) and its hurts his legacy? dnt think you understand the consept of styles making fights do you

mayweather > marquez ud by 12points

marquez ko pac 6 rounds

so really with this theory pac would get destroyed by mayweather

thats just one example of how that traingle theory is garbage:good

 

It's not triangle because Pac beat Bradley as well as JMM

 

Pac was beating the **** outta JMM before the KO, he barely escaped round 5th, was getting his ass handed to him in 6th, and would have been KTFO in the following round, two rounds tops.

Juanita knew he won the lottery with that hail mary KO of his, he knew he was so lucky that he ran away with his lucky victory, and refused the highest payday of his career for a rematch, instead he prefered to face Boredley for peanuts, just to get clowned and retired and made look as the old, overrated hasbeen he is, serves him right :blurp

 

well he didnt really did he, just like marquez didnt beat pac in their 3rd fight:think

 

Pac > Bradley >>> Marqueer

 

Pacquiao got robbed against Bradley but Bradley took Marquez to school and it took Marquez 4 times and hire Angel Heredia just to KO Pac.

Now Marquez can retire after the schooling he took from Bradley.. too bad Marquez couldn't get his 5th division belt. :hi:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgmtZOCNUOI yer nah marquez did not train for the knockout at all lol... SAME MOVE EVERYTIME!

 

:deal

JMM getting sonned in front of his fans and forced into retirement by a fighter that Pacquiao dominated :yikes

 

The funny thing is, it took Marquez 4 times and hire Angel Heredia just to KO pacquiao.

Pacquiao 2-1-1 officially against Marquez.

 

so pac got robbed by bradley but pac is officialy 2-1-1 against marquez despite marquez getting robbed in defo 1 but maybe 2 fights? biased much

bradley is officialy 1-0 against pac aswell then:deal

 

No such thing as a lucky punch, punches are thrown with the intention of landing, thrown with skill, JMM threw that punch with the intention of KO'ing Pacquiao, he managed to do so because of skill and ability it wasn't luck, no such thing as landing lucky punches, they are thrown with the intention of landing

 

PACQUIAO VS BRADLEY

- On June 21, 2012, the five WBO Championship Committee judges on the review panel announced that Pacquiao should have won his controversial defeat, with all scoring the fight unanimously in Pacquiao's favor — 117-111, 117-111, 118-110, 116-112 and 115-113.

- Among the experts above, 121 scored the bout for Pacquiao, 1 scored the bout a draw, and 1 scored the bout for Bradley.
None of the scores for Pacquiao was offered by Philippine media.
The draw score and the score for Bradley were not provided by American media.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Manny_Pacquiao_vs._Timothy_Bradley

NOW THAT WAS A ROBBERY.

PACQUIAO VS MARQUEZ 2

- 32 scored the bout for Marquez, 32 scored it for Pacquiao, and the remainder scored it a draw.
Pacquiao wins the vacant Ring Magazine jr. lightweight world title.

CLOSE FIGHT BUT NOT A ROBBERY.

PACQUIAO VS MARQUEZ 3

- 57 scored the bout for Marquez, 51 scored the bout for Pacquiao, and the remaining 36 scored the bout a draw.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Manny_Pacquiao_vs._Juan_Manuel_Marquez_(3rd_meeting)

STILL NOT A ROBBERY LIKE PACQUIAO VS BRADLEY.

No wonder why Bradley was treated like crap in the Boxing world after ''winning'' against Pacquiao.

 

i had pac beating bradley by 2 clear rounds. i had marquez beating pac in the 3rd fight by 4

 

watch with your eyes not someone else's, its clear that both jmm vs pac and bradley vs pac were robberies, makes no diff to which one was a bigger robbery