The "Lucky Punch"

Its not lame. Marquez literally fought a few days ago and you are talking about a fight that took place over a year ago.

The only deflection is this thread. We have been discussing Marquez KOing Manny for a year... we know it was not a lucky punch. You didnt even posted the video of Marquez practicing the straight right so it is not even a good "lucky punch" thread.

Why don't you go watch your hero get owned and come back and post about how he was robbed or something. Atleast then you would have a more relevant thread. This thread is a sad attempt to cling to your KO6 safety blanket instead of dealing with Marquez's loss and impending retirement.

BTW if you have not yet seen the fight why do you feel the need to comment on it in your OP? Have you or have you not seen it??? Seems someone is deflecting lmao lmao

 

just like Cormega is pathetically obsessed with his superior and all time great Nas
you are pathetically obsessed with superior all time great Pacman.

JMM beat Pacman convincingly with an awesome display of power in the 4th fight, but you're a dickrider and a shameful one at that.

 

:rofl Once Marquez hit Pac and knoked him down, I knew it was over for pac, sooner or later Pac was going to get caught again, knock down for a second time and then after that would come a stoppage, but that didn't happen, Juantard put Manny Pacquiao to sleep, Hatton style, Williams style, even worse than Duran vs Hearns, or Hearns vs Hagler, hey it happens, it happened to pac before, not Marquez though, he goes down but never stays there he always rises.

 

What one fighter does to another, has nothing to do with what another fighter can do. Hence the phrase styles make fights. Period. No need for any lame response you might come up with.

 

Cormega did you watch the fight or not?

I want to know whether you are:

i) A hardcore Juantard who is arguing how the fight is perceived without viewing it yourself

Or

ii) a hardcore Juantard so distraught by SD12 you create deflection threads and deny ever viewing the bout

So which one are you?

 

No disrespect, but I think it is YOU that needs to relook at the original post. You keep bringing up Bradley "sonning" Marquez lessening JMM's brutal KO of Pacquiao. When the original post has nothing, in no way shape or form to do with Bradley/Marquez. Just Pac getting Slept. And it wasnt a lucky punch by the way.....

 

I would love to hear your explanation how the original post has nothing to do with that fight, "in no way shape or form," when the OP talks about Marquez Bradley???

 

because if you read that Whole sentence and not just what you copied, you would see that he was setting up for YOU all to comment about it, but his original post was about nothing but the punch.

Cue *******s whining about how Pacquiao was "dominating" before he got his dick knocked in the dirt and how Bradley "dominated" Marquez. :deal

 

Reading comprehension my dude. thats all it is.. lol

 

That was his original post.

Any post that makes same implication about the competitiveness of a bout that goes against public perception is inviting responses. If he did not want comments on Bradley Marquez then why mention it?

Dumbass Juantard.

 

They are consistent at least. I've definitely seen Rustico Torrecampo's knockout of Pacquiao written off as being a "lucky punch". (that is, when they aren't claiming it was a low blow despite clearly being a power connect on the chin :nut )

If Rios knocks Pac out, you can bet your ass it'll be from a lucky punch. :yep


It's really pretty amusing, their ardent refusal to ever hold their man accountable for getting KTFO. "Hey, no fair, that cheat threw a lucky punch!! :twisted:" - it calls to mind the Zelenoff "ref, he is hitting me in the face! I'm a body only boxer, dawg!"

 

Oh and there was absolutely nothing lucky about it. Marquez worked hard to prepare that shot for use some time during the match, based on a long and intimate firsthand study of Pacquiao's habits, and kayoed a sparring partner with it during the lead-up. This is all common knowledge. :deal

 

I am sure there are some *******s that give Manny fans a bad name... I even thought the KO was a bit lucky initially... and then I saw/heard training videos, knockout during sparring ect ect.

I just find the timing of this thread absolutely hilarious. We have had a million of them and it is not like more people are claiming it is a lucky punch this week then last.

It is a coping mechanism, that is all, and it is extremely funny to watch Juantards cling to their safety blanket and refuse to bring up Saturday night.

Speaking of Saturday night IB your card for Marquez Bradley was a bit off... did you ever re score the fight

 

I haven't yet. I've acknowledged that my visibility of the action was somewhat poor, so Bradley's quicker/lighter flurries might not have all registered for me while Marquez's patiently loaded up counters, when they landed, did so at low enough speed for me to more easily spot. Even with that being the case, I had it a draw...so watching under optimal conditions it seems logical that a more favorable score for Bradley will be the end result...I just can't say as to what degree more favorable (ie close or wide) and won't know until getting around to it.

 

Just so you know: im not a "Juantard", nor a "*****" or whatever. I just love the art of boxing. And maybe you are not one of those Pacquiao fans. But just like this thread. I too have come across this last couple days those that have tried to diminish JMM KO of Pac, now that Bradley beat him. THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER. And it's ok that Pac lost. It's how he comes back that matters.