The Manny Pacquiao deception, Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez II

but those judges are corrupt!!! :|:|:|

 

Actually there is a bunch of 115-112 scores that translate to 8 rounds for Marquez.

Show me Boom_Boom....

show me something similar to this but that favors Pacquiao....

:hey

 

I had Pac winning by 1 point, so basically the difference is one round which people saw in different ways. For instance, I gave the first round to Manny and not surprised if someone gave it to Marquez.

I respect who says that Marquez won the fight but I don't respect instead who's saying that "Marquez clearly won the fight" atsch
There were a couple of rounds out there (2 or 3) that were quite hard to score.
It was a close fight and any decision is justified

 

Tell it to the world Puga......"Boxings official judges are clean living honest human beings."

Once again I've been schooled by a *******.:bowdown

 

Try scoring Mosley-Mora, that was a hard fight to score, both these Pacquiao-Marquez fights were cut and dry easy fights to score.

 

Yeah but there were 2 or 3 rounds quite hard to score...That makes the difference

 

yeah like only 5

and I dont see a single one that had the simliar scorecard as you did giving JMM 9 rounds.

which further prooves you cant score for ****.

 

Here's a couple of scorecards... the only ones that COUNT! :hey

This content is protected

 

yes and the list you have are more reliable in scoring a boxing fight than those press people you listed.

also the list that you have are just made to prove a point that some scored it for jmm. but it did not include press that scores it for pacquiao. for example, the boxing bulletin has 5 separate scorers but your list only included 3, 2 of them scored it for jmm and 1 a draw. but it purposely left the other 2 people who scored it for pacquiao to make an impression that the boxing bulletin had it for jmm.

http://theboxingbulletin.blogspot.com/2009/06/score-it-manny-pacquiao-vs-juan-manuel_24.html

also, donaire i think reviewed his score if i remember it correctly after rewatching the fight. and he was with 2 other filipino anchors with quinito scoring it for pac while chino is not sure with his score since he did not tabulate.

bottomline is, people think this is a close fight that could have gone either way but you on the other hand thinks it is a clear win for jmm and a robbery of some sort coz the judges are corrupt.

 

Correct Puga, thats a rarity for you.
That shot that felled Marquez was a beautifully timed shot by Pacquiao.

The shot of the night indeed.....but for consistency on a round by round basis (round by round being something not comprehenible to *******s) Marquez landed the harder "shots" (plural) "shots" of the night.


Thats the one thing I vehemently defend about this fight.
There are fights like Taylor-Chavez that can be argued who you favored, the flash flurries by the percieved boxer or the hard accurate consistent shots by JC Chavez.

That argument cant even be made in this fight of Marquez-Pacquiao, in that the percieved boxer also consistently landed harder, cleaner, and more accurate shots round after round.......

So this was'nt a case to say, which style do you prefer, because even if you prefer harder accurate shots, Marquez landed those shots on a more consistent basis than did Pacquiao.
Its not a matter of style tastes in this fight, Pacquiao got throroughly beaten every which way round after round......




Shot of the night=Pacquiao

Shots of the night=Marquez:deal

:bbb:bbb:bbb:bbb

 

Official boxing judges are honest.
Join your fellow ******* in telling it to the world.....

I've been owned by another *******.:think


Better yet, open up a thread and praise the honest judges, refs, commisions, promoters, alphabet groups, etc.......

The forum will thankyou Caneman.

 

but but but but :| :| :|

 

oh i'm sorry what i meant was the picture and not the punch (shot) my bad.

they both landed well and cleanly and if you will check the compubox, not that i believe in it, jmm edgeds pac through 12 rounds just barely but if we count the number of rounds, pac has it with more rounds.

if i remember 2 or 3 rounds are close that it could be a draw or scored for either fighter and no one except probably you would complain.

so you are confrming that you only gave 2 or 3 rounds for pacquiao for this fight divac?

 

but but but but :| :| :|

 

There was one close round in the fight, and even that was'nt very difficult to score, the 9th.......

I gave it to Marquez for his consistency throughout the whole round. If I gave it to Pacquiao, I'd still have Marquez up wide on my scorecard 115-112 which would equate to 8 round won for Marquez.


Marquez had won a string of rounds leading to that 9th.....
The 9th was much much closer than the previous that many people tend to give those type of rounds after previous non-close ones, to the fighter that has been losing rounds.

I score the round period, I dont give a **** who's been winning or losing the previous ones.


Btw, someone tell Boom_Boom that 115-112 is wide, 8-4 in rounds......


Only five out of these scored 115-112 Boom_Boom????

Show me a few of the Pacquiao links having it that wide for Pacquiao?:rofl:nut