The Manny Pacquiao deception, Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez II

Poll ruined by *******s, they really are a huge negative for the boxing world

 

you are a hater. i know your history. please die :good

 

u got some weak azz arguments backed with little to no facts...i dont..next one:hi:

 

pls.. dont cry :|

 

On the highlighted, quite frankly I would'nt expect someone unlogical to win a debate with someone who uses logic, so I wont blame you for not debating me.......

However your claims of me being biased towards Mexican fighters are totally unfounded

You hurt because I'm able to put into words the reasons why Marquez twice schooled Pacquiao. Cant say I'm shocked considering you're a big Pacquiao fan.

......but I dont believe its right to call someone biased toward a certain nationality if you dont back it up with enough facts.

Give me enough fights that will lead the forum to believe I'm biased toward Mexicans?

To base it on my scorecard of Chavez-Whitaker is absurd.


Test me.......give me matchups of certain fights that you might feel I scored for the Mexican fighter over a non-Mexican that you would think I'm being biased in, and I'll let you know who I thought won?

I'm certainly not shy about scoring against the grain in a matchup, but race certainly does'nt play a factor in it.

If you're going to label me biased toward Mexican fighters at least back up your words. Test me!

 

Ha, I had almost forgotten I scored a 10-8 for Marquez in that rematch. It was that totally one sided round where Pacquiao got his eye busted and Marquez used him as a pinata.

Am I biased for scoring a 10-8 for Marquez in that round without a knockdown.
I must have been just as biased when I gave two 10-8 rounds for Pacquiao in his fight with DLH.

 

what the hell! they get bribedatsch

 

On the post above me that describes using 12 judges and have them score it the following day........

I think it would be better for a pool of about 15 judges to show up on fightnight and have 5 of them picked to judge a championship fight by lottery pick right before the fighters enter into the ring.......

......I never understood why judges are announced well before a fight. That would give promoters and what have you a chance to pay them off.

 

Yep, in around where Marquez outlanded Pac by 10 punches, which explained why for the entire fight, Marquez actaually outlanded Pac by 2 (I can not be too exact but definitelyI can recall less than 10). I think the exact numbers is 19 versus 9 punches.

the one sided domination of Pac versus ODLH was nowhere near what JMM did, not even remotely close, not even 1/5. And yet you have you scored it 10-8 in a round without knockdown?


If you you graciously scored it 10-8, then the first round of the Pac-Marquez 1 would be 10-2? That was utter domination with 3 knockdowns! You don't really know how to score a fight!
Infact, it was only you in the entire ESB who scored it as such.

 

there is no deception in this fight.. it was a great classic battle and a very very tough fight to judge.. it could've gone either way.. only haters will call this a deception or robbery..

all i can say is.. to all the haters.. just move on!!! it was a great close fight and lets just keep it that way....

 

Hagler won.

 

Pac will knock Marquez out in a mismatch!!!

 

What deception? It was a close fight could've gone either way. You need to post every second of every round, not just selective highlights.

 

Every time I watch Pac-Marquez 2, I have it 114-114.

 

that's because you're a *******.