The Marquez vs Pacquiao nonsense

now, why would marquez need herrera in his camp when he beat pac that many times? mexicans were just desperate to stop pac from defeating their fighters hence the herrera help. that is the only reason they persisted rematching pac until the win. now they don't want another rematch or they will lose that keeping good feeling. marquez just really bulked up on the last fight that he got stronger when he is supposed to be older. fights 1,2,3 he did not knock down pac even once.

 

Have you polished your Pac**** badge today?

It was Roach, and your fvcking idiot hero that kept wanting rematches, because they knew that EVERYONE was aware that he looked s&&t against Marquez.

It was fvck all to do with Mexicans demanding anything.

 

Pacquiao-Roidquez III was a case where because the guy that was expected to be blown out and/or knocked out didn't, and was actually highly competitive, people swayed their judgement w/ far more bias.

EVERYONE WAS SAYING THAT ROIDQUEZ WAS GOING TO BE KNOCKED OUT IN UNDER SIX ROUNDS.

Roidquez had been extremely vocal about beating Pacquiao in I and II going as far as printing t-shirts.

Yet when the winner was announced, Roidquez slithered out of the ring and went to sulk in the locker room. Roidquez had the opportunity to denounce the robbery - LIVE - and IN THE RING w/ Pacquiao, but he ran away to cry robbery.

Roidquez's face was BUSTED. Pacquiao had barely a mark on his face. There was FAR more facial damage on Pacquiao in I and II. And in III, Roidquez was juiced to the gills!

 

Hahahaha

If Marquez is supposed to be on roids, explain why Paciow has got a head like a thirty bob cabbage?

I've seen smaller paper rounds ffs.

 

Incorrect

 

Dude, there are plenty of pictures and fights of Pac when he was in his teens. Same Bobblehead action going on back then!

:hi:

 

I think JMM won 3 out of the 4. 1,3 and 4

 

pac 1 2 and marquez 3 and 4 although I havent scored the 3rd in awhile

 

No, it was a case of pac being taken to boxing school and given a lesson in boxing by instructor Mr.Marquez. shut up pac****, pac lost the fight and everyone knew it, never had PAC ever been booed by the fans until jmm vs PAC 3. He fought and beat morales, Barrera and odlh who all had bigger Mexican drawing power then jmm. So the "there were a lot of Mexican fans" does not fly in this case. It is what it is, PAC was given a gift on the 3rd fight.


And your whole "roid" b.s,

PAC denied testing for the Floyd fight & denied testing for jmm 3/4. So stop your crying sissy.

 

juan actually dropped pac twice, not once

 

He has also stunned & gave pac the chicken legs in every single fight.

PAC and roach also admitted that pacquia was close to quitting in the jmm vs PAC 2 fight.

Its like these pac****s don't acknowledge facts.

 

stunned yea but I don't think I ever seen Pac get chicken legs even when Jmm knocked him down in the 4th fight he got up with steady legs.

 

Marquez dropped Pac twice in that fight.

I scored the 3rd fight for Marquez and I'm a pac fan

To me Marquez definitely won the third fight

He was impressive as hell in the first fight but I think he lost that one

Second one really was really close

 

Plenty of people on the night had it a draw, or very narrow for Bradley. :roll:

The consensus is that Bradley won, just as the consensus is that Pacquiao won in Bradley I, but people forget that a large majority consensus regarding the deserving winner doesn't change the fact that both fights were close and contained lots of rounds in which there were things you could favor on either side (Bradley's jabs & body shots vs. Pacquiao's flurries in many of their rounds; likewise Bradley's activity and accurate jabs vs. Marquez's counters and body shots)