The Marvin Hart, Jack Johnson and James Jeffries Triangle

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by he grant, Aug 27, 2016.


  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,430
    9,414
    Jul 15, 2008
    Trying to decompress from work I've dove back into A Pollack's outstanding book on Jack Johnson's title reign. I especially enjoy the significant portion and detailed coverage of Johnson's 1910 title defense against James Jeffries. Putting aside the historical significance of the bout, one of the top three of the 20th Century, it leaves me more undecided than ever about how a prime Jeffries would have done against a pretty prime Johnson in say 1906.

    The 1910 version of Jeffries was a shell, period. He trained, blah, blah blah but he was nothing like the versions that peaked destroying Juhlin 2, Corbett 2 and Monroe ... that version was a beast at the top of his game. He was thirty and choose to draw the color line against a 28 year old, physically prime Jack Johnson, the poor decision that cost him his place in history.

    On July 4, 1910 Jack Johnson beat on James Jeffries worse than Larry Holmes beat on Tex Cobb. The difference was that Jeffries was a shell that had absolutely no right to even be in that ring. Any argument that he did is agenda driven. He took a frightful beating in blazing heat in front of his world and gave his all , never quitting, his Red Badge of Courage for his horrendous color line drawing and pathetic , inexcusable arrogance in handling Johnson right up until refusing to shake his hand before the opening bell ...

    By all accounts Johnson looked superb. He was still near his own physical prime, had been active and was highly motivated by money, respect and revenge. Afterwords he received much praise as perhaps the best ever. Many wrote that Jeffries at his best never would have had a chance. All that is ok but I can't get over the fact of the Marvin Hart fight.

    Jack Johnson, highly motivate and in his own physical prime could not dominate Marvin Hart. Jack likely outpointed him and possibly by more than a little but he could not come anywhere close to administering the sort of beating he delivered in Reno so I have to ask myself how can anyone so quickly dream he'd have handled a prime Jeffries, much bigger, stronger, harder hitting, faster, with a chin of steel and terrific stamina if he struggles with Hart ?

    My guess is that Jeffries ultimately cursed himself. By drawing the color line while both men were in their primes , completely his own doing based on arrogance and ignorance he cheated himself of a fight he very well might have won.

    I am a huge fan of Jack Johnson and feel he was an exceptional fighter both of his day and any day. He was in the class of the Chris Byrd, Whitaker, Mayweather, Hopkins sort , defensive minded but cobra dangerous .. I also believe Jeffries may be terrifically underrated based on many things from his own inexperience ( very few actual fights ) to bad hands which handicapped his demonstrations of power to of course Reno .. I just remain unresolved on how these two ultimately match up ...
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,195
    Feb 11, 2005
    Nicely articulated conundrum. Johnson seemed able to fight up or down to his competition. The O'Brien fight is another troubling affair for me. In the end, of course, he is a great, a top 10 all time heavyweight by most criteria.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    Just to note Jeffries did not destroy Ruhlin in their first fight,it was a draw.

    Which fights do you say Jeffries was handicapped by bad hands in? ps I know about the Armstrong fight.
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,430
    9,414
    Jul 15, 2008
    I was stressing his peak , essentially his last three fights of overwhelming dominance. Jeffries had hand trouble most of his career. He broke and injured his hands multiple times and it plagued him though out his title reign. There is no doubt he nursed them in power shot and punch output ..

    Interesting compared to Dempsey who I recently read never had a hand issue in his life .. like many in many things a lot is luck ..
     
  5. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Understand that it was the American white culture that fully EXPECTED all white HWT champions to draw the color line. Far more than just Jeffries drawing the color line as if he really had a choice. No white man from that time wanted any black man to be given the chance to be the physical superior of all men which was what the worlds hwt boxing championship was looked upon at that time. The black man once having this superiority would then infiltrate all aspects of white society and in the end take their white women.
     
  6. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,874
    Oct 8, 2013
    Very nice breakdown he grant. I share similar views and conundrums. All I know is the fight would of been far more competitive that what occurred.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    I don't cut Jeffries slack because others were racist too,his public statements and behaviour towards Johnson were inexcusable imo.Asked if he was going to defend against Johnson he said ,
    " I am not into fighting skunks yet".
    Jeffries made countless racial statements saying unequivocably he would not take a chance on losing his title to a member of the black race.This at a time when the Police Gazette was urging him to defend against Johnson.He refused to acknowledge a telegram from Johnson congratulatinghim for signing for the fight , he refused to shake his hand at the public signing of the fight,he refused to shake his hand just prior to the fight starting,and when Johnson went over to his corner to commiserate with him after the fight he was waved away. Johnson went into print after both the Burns and Jeffries fights praising the courage of his opponents.
    Burns' reply was the fight was stopped prematurely, and Jeffries said he was given drugged tea .Bottom line Jeffries was a racist **** and the fact that he had plenty of company in the US doesn't excuse him in any way from it.

    Fact is Jeffries was prejudiced against black people , so was his best friend Tom Sharkey, and his chief rabble rouser Jim Corbett.
     
  8. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,587
    36,838
    Jul 4, 2014
    Based on what are we saying that johnson likley outpointed Hart? Is there footage of the fight to judge? Contemporary accounts that say that Johnson won it?

    Just curious.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    Mendoza has the only known copy in existence, along with the Langford v Hague fight , a Harry Greb bout,
    and the Fitzsimmons v Ruhlin fight. Unfortunately he has given his solemn word to fellow respected historians not to let us plebs see them.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,195
    Feb 11, 2005
    By the rules of the day, Hart won. Johnson got out to an early lead but failed to push the fight over the second half and Hart showed more aggression, which was not at all ineffectual aggression by the accounts. At least that's how I remember from reading articles.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    By the rules stipulated by the promoter/referee.
     
  12. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,430
    9,414
    Jul 15, 2008
    All we know is that Johnson never serious hurt him, made him retreat or came close to stopping him. Hart may be vastly under rated, a kind of Gatti of his day according to A Pollack .. that being said , he took everything a prime Johnson dished out, rarely too a back step and forced Johnson to back up .. this was a fight that Johnson badly wanted, a match up against a top white fighter and he did not dominate ... this is why it makes me think that the prime Jeffries, much bigger, stronger, faster and harder hitting than Hart might have made a historic mistake by drawing the color line ... the weathered version that was so dominated was a ridiculous substitute .. the cost is truly Jeffries place in all time rankings .. if the prime Jeffries fought and defeated Johnson as virtually all at the time believed he would have his place in history would have been more solid .. as it stands, mostly on the Johnson loss we have no clue if he was a true talent or a Chuvalo fighting in an early age ..
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,081
    Jun 2, 2006
    Whose fault was it the fight did not happen when Jeffries was champ?
    ps I'll have to re-read Adam's book on Jeffries I don't remember all those hand problems you mentioned.:huh
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,430
    9,414
    Jul 15, 2008
    Completely Jeffries ... his drawing the color line was openly debated in the press, he was arrogant and condescending ... in addition, his behavior towards Johnson at all points leading up to the 1910 bout was disgusting ... MY point is that Jeffries screwed himself. ...

    Reread Adam's book .. Jeffries suffered from hand troubles through out his career ..
     
  15. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Ouch. You ready to stop making excuses yet, Perry?