Of coures I dont mean LITERALLY pre-filled out....just the overall outcome was pre-decoded. It was at the discretion of the individual 'judges' how they - mathematically - made that happen on the night.
So the two judges who scored it close had almost the exact same card except for one round. How exactly could they orchestrate that if they were not able to have conversation during the fight? Even if they all decided to score in favor of Canelo they would not know which round to skew in favor of. Its impossible. Rounds are scored individually then turned in. The logical explanation is Byrd is not a good judge but the other two actually are good judges and the fight really was close. Its also possible that the majority of the general public and the media don't know how to score a fight to save their own lives (see Teddy Atlas). I include myself too.
How they arrived at the 'desired result' was left up to them. But either implicitly or explicitly be in no doubt those judges went into that fight fully understanding what was expected of them by their employers....
Right, proof of a fixed judge. Those who felt Canleo won were Hopkins who has business connections to him, Morales a Mexican fighter, Oscar who promotes him ( and picks the judges ) , and people like that. The truth is there has been corrupt judging in MANY of Canelo's matches. This content is protected Anyone who can't see an obvious patter here is blind. Screw this, and don't insult the fans of the sport. This is cheating. And cheating is what happened last Saturday night.
All three judges got retirement money for this scam. The fight wasn't even close. I had it 117-111 for GGG. The best result for Canelo that I can understand is 116-112. But I can also understand 118-110 for GGG.
Also, was the the fight of the year? Ring Magazine says so. It was good, but not great. And the majority thinks it was scored for the wrong man. They made this the fight of the year to help Canleo and those who make $$$ on him easier to market.
Are you ****ing serious man? You think a cross dressing crackhead, who is a promoter in one of the dirtiest most corrupt sports could have fixed a fight just to make some money?
Also, was the the fight of the year? Ring Magazine says so. It was good, but not great. And the majority thinks it was scored for the wrong man. They made this the fight of the year to help Canleo and those who make $$$ on him easier to market. Do you really think that was the fight of the year? More like robbery of the year. I'd tell you to get a new act, but I'm not sure what else you are good at besides being an internet toll. PS: Don't use the word " US " for GGG. You are not a fan of his. Its very disingenuous.
You you even know what fight fixing means? Both party's are usually involved in rigged fights. Jake LaMotta took part in fixed fights when he purposefully lost , mainly for gambling reasons. Fixed fight means a fixed result. GGG didn't agree to take a draw and didn't agree to take a loss. He could have knocked Canelo out for the win if he was good enough but he wasn't remotely good enough to even score a single drop. He isn't the first guy to have Judges go against him and he certainly won't be the last. Favorable judging and gift decisions is not the same as fixing a fight.
i agree with them. I note they didnt make canelo fighter of the year, so no. it was fantastic fight. Were you not entertained?! i am disgusted by you wanting to fracture and split up the 3G fanbsem thats disgusting, mate. if you were a true fan you would join me in knowing that 3G will knock Canelos block off in the next fight.