The mechanics of a punch - The left hook - With Jermell Charlo and David Lemieux

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Jul 30, 2020.


  1. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    48,046
    36,819
    Apr 17, 2011
    Wasn´t Nigel at 168lbs?
    Well, he briefly held the WBO belt at 160. So maybe Jermall would have been "unlucky". But Jermell is at 154.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    I actually think Charlo is at a similar level to the level Benn was at in his prime except Benn had more power at 160.
     
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Benn beat Barkley at 160, Charlo hasn`t beat anyone as lauded as Barkley was yet.
     
  4. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,518
    7,063
    Aug 17, 2011
    The weight transference is the exact same for the hook and the uppercut.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  5. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    48,046
    36,819
    Apr 17, 2011
    My point was that his stay at the weight was short.
     
  6. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    48,046
    36,819
    Apr 17, 2011
    No. Not at all.
     
  7. iii

    iii Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,832
    4,093
    May 3, 2016
    I agree he may be better Benn was a crude low skilled Boxer, but heart & power you won't beat!
     
    mark ant likes this.
  8. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    13,296
    16,907
    Mar 17, 2018
    Hi Mark

    Who do you buy your Green from?

    Id like to try some of what your smoking lol
     
    UnleashtheFURY likes this.
  9. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    I meant in terms of athleticism both guys had/have great hand speed, I do except that Charlo has never beat a killer like G-man, but that was at 168, the best guy Benn beat at 160 was a sluggish Barkley in a brawl, he developed into a much better fighter at 168 despite collecting less KO`s at the higher weight, he wasn`t as reckless and fought much better in his rematch v Eubank than in their first clash which he himself has stated was a bad performance, he blamed it on bad prep, he was also far too gung-ho v Watson which is why he sacked his lousy trainers after that bout, all they said in his corner was: 'steam him'!
     
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    But he had more fights at 160 than at 168.
     
  11. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,518
    7,063
    Aug 17, 2011
    Exactly. It is the exact same on your feet.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  12. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    48,046
    36,819
    Apr 17, 2011
    Well yeah, but he had 3 title fights at 160. And that happened in the span of less than a year.
    He had over 10 title fights at 168 and it is the division he was known for.
    So why would Charlos care at all? Maybe Jermall would have been worried for a short period.
     
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Charlo would have wanted to fight the winner of Benn v Barkley or Benn v Eubank I`d say.