The Mike Tyson that beat Spinks vs Haye

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxfan1, Jun 23, 2011.


  1. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,858
    4
    Nov 7, 2009
    Tyson is not half as good as people make him out to be.
     
  2. greathamza

    greathamza Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,652
    1
    Feb 14, 2011
    Fixed it for you
     
  3. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    Lennox Lewis was far more comfortable & experienced at fighting fellow Superheavys. Why do you think he was happy to take on Superheavy punchers like Ruddock, Tucker, Bruno, McCall, Akinwande, Golota, Briggs, Grant, Rahman & Vitali, but didn't want to fight Byrd & Ruiz? The best 2 "small" heavys he fought were a 5'9 Tua at 245lbs & a 5'10 Shot Tyson at 234lbs, both were badly overweight (in boxing terms) slow lethargic plodders when Lennox met them. Maybe you count 6'1 Mercer as a small heavy, but he was 238lbs & gave Lewis an even war which i scored 5-4-1 for Lewis.
     
  4. gregy741

    gregy741 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    1
    May 11, 2010
    yea but haye is not even 15% as good as people make him out to be
     
  5. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    Michael Spinks proved more at Heavyweight than Haye has...
     
  6. BodyBlaster

    BodyBlaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,634
    64
    Jul 25, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  7. BodyBlaster

    BodyBlaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,634
    64
    Jul 25, 2007
    Not true.
    Tyson was much, much better, than how he is remembered.
    Tyson when fit, focused and with a decent training team, was at very least a pick em with ANY heavyweight from any era!

    People remember his post Prison debacle, not the 20yr old monster who was as good as anyone ever!
     
  8. DJAdAmS

    DJAdAmS Ex-Army Middleweight Full Member

    1,010
    24
    Nov 16, 2008
    I think it would be a terrific fight, but i would have to say Tyson. People who say inside a round clearly are idiots. Bruno got to 5 rounds and he had a weak chin and poor defence. I'd say Tyson by 8-9 KO, but holyfield and a prime Foreman and Lewis would of always been his cryptonite!!
     
  9. DJAdAmS

    DJAdAmS Ex-Army Middleweight Full Member

    1,010
    24
    Nov 16, 2008
    :lol::lol::lol::lol: Come on he was hyped up and thought and old berbick for the title!! I can name half a dozen better heavyweights who would beat a prime for prime Tyson. Ali/Frazier/Foreman/Lewis/Holyfield/Louis
     
  10. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Tyson was a horrible hype machine, 2 year lay-off Holmes and all the other drug addicts he beat up can't match anyone on my list and you know it.
     
  11. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    James Tillis gave Tyson one hell of a scrap and Tillis was not even a poor mans Ali, c'mon people. :lol:
     
  12. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    any version of tyson pre - lewis would beat haye. difference in class.
     
  13. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tyson was still green at that point, and he dominated much better fighters later on.
     
  14. macp1

    macp1 Guest

    i think haye would remain the Cruiserweight Champion of the World
     
  15. BodyBlaster

    BodyBlaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,634
    64
    Jul 25, 2007

    **** off! Tyson beats Frazier 10 from 10, and would have been heavily favoured over Holyfield Foreman and Lewis. I think he beats Louis too, his quickness and ferocity a match for anyone. Ali is Ali, but again, never fought anyone capable of beating him to the punch. Tyson may have been.