Mosley he had a close fight that could have been a draw, and tko'd Margarito. It could have been Cotto, but he doesn't know how to slip 7 straight uppercuts for some reason.
margarito by far , mosley beat the most weight drained man ive ever seen in my life , no doupt margo would chop him up at 154 , and everyone deep down knows margarito didnt have loaded glvoes for the cotto fight for **** sake the ref checked them before the fight and then after the fight he paraded around the ring brushing past people with them still on
Cotto deserves it but since he lsot to Margo and Mosley's fight with him was close.. I'd say Mosley. but Margo's cheating really screwed over Cotto's career
1. Mosley. Beat Margarito from Pillar to Post, in their fight. Lost a close fight to Cotto. The best all-around boxer of the three. My opinion is that he would win a rematch with Cotto and beat him more often than not, 2. Cotto. Beat Mosley in a close fight and lost to Margarito in a fight where at one point he had a lead. Cotto is a very good boxer, but I'll stop short of calling him elite. I also don't think much of his chin. In my opinion that his loss to Margarito has more to do with his abillity to take punshment, than anything that Margarito might have have had in his gloves. 3. Margarito. Beat Cotto by stoppage in a close fight. Got his butt kicked by Mosley. Margarito has a great chin and decent skills. However compared to Mosley and Cotto he's not as good. Also due to the finding of illagal substances in his hand wraps before he fought Mosley. Every one of his wins has to be questioned. This is not to say that they are not ligt wins just that if he did it once how do we know that he did not do it more times?
keys words: WHEN THEY FOUGHT EACH OTHER! NOT PRIME FOR PRIME! In my opinion, it was cotto. Marg took himself out of the equation with his fetish for cement.
It's quite strange that Cotto is a very close second because it should really go. 1. Mosley. 2. Margarito. 3. Cotto.