Ugh. None of the above should have been an option. Credible and sanctioning body are mutually exclusive terms in boxing.
They all suck ass, but the IBF seems to have the least amount of bad decisions and also seems to be more consistent with making their #1 challengers credible.
WBC is generally looked upon as the legit sanctioning body.....but c'mon banning Arreola for six months, then weren't they asking Shane Mosley for a public apology for taking the Margarito fight???? yeah, I guess you guys are right the IBF has the least credibility issues
That's like asking who's less evil; Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, or The BTK Killer? They're all ****ed!
They are all corrupt, I voted WBC just because I've always liked their belt, reminds me of the old Tyson days.
Oh yes, the good ol' "we be corrupt". As one Floyd Mayweather Jr. is fond of saying, they award the 'official' belt lol
Their all terrible although I think the WBA have now solidified themselves as the worst of the 4 belts with their "super" and regular "titles" and constant John Ruiz title shots.