Not sure why people are so worried about the Joshua v Takam cards, even if you don't agree with the wider margins there's no doubt whatsoever that Joshua was streets ahead. Takam had been down twice and was on the end of a one sided beat up. On the other hand the cards for the Wilder v Ortiz fight had Wilder comfortable winning when Ortiz was stopped, Now that was a fix set in just in case
That's bad......... A toss up between Mayweather/Canelo and Williams/Lara Mayweather/Delahoya: honorable mention. That fight was not close at all. Winky/Mosley 2: honorable mention. The judge that scored that fight a draw was a moron, Winky hit him more and even toyed with him in that fight.
^^^ and this was possible the most ridiculous/biased thing I have ever seen from a referee. Literally warning him for punching (I think poor Ottke got knocked down at that point, but was ruled a "slip")
If a boxer is 8 points up after 12 rounds while he should be 4 points up in reality, makes the scoring just as bad as being 2 points up after 12, while you should be 2 points down and lose. 1st doesn't register as much as the second option because the endresult is the same, but in reality it's the exact same thing as both are a 4 round swing. It shows that the guy never got a fair shake, and would still even end up emtyhanded if he dropped the other guy 3 times in that last 2 rounds.
Not Shumenov's first time... Campillo vs Shumenov 2 was 2010 "Robbery of the year" Levi Martinez 117-111 | Patricia Morse Jarman 111-117 | Jerry Roth 113-115
Cloud robbed Campillo at 2012 too Dennis Nelson 111-115 | David Robertson 116-110 | Joel Elizondo 114-112