The most undeserving challengers who won the title ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Jun 10, 2011.


  1. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    the wbo wasn't even a recognized belt in the 90s. that's why you have guys with 7 fights fighting for that title.
     
  2. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,069
    1,286
    Jan 1, 2011
  3. g.dog

    g.dog Active Member Full Member

    578
    1
    Jun 20, 2009
    Luis Santana !
     
  4. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    467
    Mar 13, 2010
    Tyson against Bruno 2....
     
  5. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,066
    8,430
    Jul 17, 2009
    Not really. Tyson was a former champion coming off two comeback victories.
    Okay,Pete McNeeley and Buster Mathis Jr.were n't exactly world beaters,but in modern times even wins over low ranked fighters are enough to get you ranked yourself.
    Besides,Tyson had already beaten Bruno,so consensus said that he had a good chance of repeating it.
     
  6. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    467
    Mar 13, 2010
    I disagree, no way Does Tyson deserve a title shot after beating Mathis and Mcneely.

    Once he came out of prison i felt he had to work his way back into title contention and the 2 above, simply dont cut it.

    Who did Ali fight on his comeback? compare that to Tyson
     
  7. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,579
    9,930
    Jul 28, 2009
    Your signature. :lol::lol:
     
  8. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    467
    Mar 13, 2010
    Whats my signature?
     
  9. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,066
    8,430
    Jul 17, 2009
    I agree when it comes to comparing Ali and Tyson's comeback opponents !!!!!!!!! But there's been worse examples than Tyson. Leonard should n't have been allowed to challenge Hagler without a tune up.
     
  10. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    467
    Mar 13, 2010
    There was plenty of guys Tyson could have and should have fought before fighting for a title.

    This also would have prepared him better for Holyfield
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,563
    Nov 24, 2005
    I think the fact that Tyson was clearly number 1 contender before he went away did help his case.
    Also, it was only the WBC version title held by Frank Bruno that he challenged for ....... and Bruno hadn't exactly done anything to get his own shot.

    Vitali Klitschko v Sam Peter is a similar case.
     
  12. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    467
    Mar 13, 2010
    Champion emeritus bullsh*t

    But the scenery changed dramatically from when Tyson went in to when he came out. Why did Bruno defend it against Tyson anyway? didnt he think of a safer defence?
     
  13. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,563
    Nov 24, 2005
    It was in his contract, the conditions of his challenge to Mccall. Don King options.
     
  14. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,066
    8,430
    Jul 17, 2009
    Blame Don King. He was keeping his boy in the money. That's why he put a block on Lennox Lewis challenging him for the WBC title in '96.
     
  15. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,066
    8,430
    Jul 17, 2009
    Bruno wanted returns against Tyson and Lewis. Maybe his people thought that Tyson was the safer option,in lieu of his inactivity.