The myth about Tyson's weak opposition

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Big Ukrainian, Apr 19, 2014.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,601
    27,272
    Feb 15, 2006
    Not realy, because Dempsey was a legit ATG, as opposed to a one hit wonder.

    That alows us to back him a bit more emphaticaly in these sort of fantasy fights.
     
  2. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    This message is hidden because foxy01 is on your ignore list


    I bet he was talking **** as usual
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Douglas kicked his ass.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    That cannot be known.
    Dempsey was only 188 pounds anyway.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005

    They were GLORIOUS BEAUTIFUL GODS !
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,601
    27,272
    Feb 15, 2006
    No dominant champions has genuinely fought weak opposition, unless he has missed out some significant players.

    There is no such thing as a weak era.
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,820
    46,530
    Feb 11, 2005
    I agree in a sense, but I also think that one division in particular has undergone an evolution by mere fact of its uncapped top end... the heavies.

    But yes, you are basically correct. A lot of "would have or could have been greats" had their careers thwarted by a great in his prime.
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,601
    27,272
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,459
    9,449
    Jul 15, 2008
    It's true .. no one that stands up to a sick Miske, a tiny Gibbons or a highly skilled Firpo in the bunch .. maybe if they were 37 and had one fight in four years they'd meet your standard of excellence .. :lol:
     
  10. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,185
    25,448
    Jan 3, 2007
    I think you're over selling these guys a bit, but in general I agree. His opposition wasn't at all bad. Most of them were well trained men with amateur pedigree, decent size, skills, punching ability and in most cases reasonable age and recent activity levels. Ruddock is another one I'd ad to that list. Tyson also didn't fight during an era where people of certain color or background were pushed to the back of the bus, while lesser men got a shot at the brass ring.
     
  11. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Care to tell us how many of the above had either, drugs, booze, or mental health issues at the time they fought Tyson?

    As for bigging up Frank Bruno, please? Even in the UK he was only loved because of his personality, not his ability.
     
  12. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,459
    9,449
    Jul 15, 2008
    I don't think I'm overselling them at all .. all had excellent size and athleticism .. all were in their prime years excluding Holmes .. all were doing off career highs .. all had pretty extensive experience fighting n world class levels .. here are the men:

    Berbick
    Smith
    Thomas
    Tucker
    Briggs
    Holmes
    Tubbs
    Spinks
    Bruno
    Williams

    Name me ten better opponents any other heavyweight champ defeated let alone in as dominant a fashion .. Tyson may not have lost a dozen rounds in all these fights combined ..
     
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,185
    25,448
    Jan 3, 2007
    Through out all of boxing history you had contenders and even champions who had bad lifestyle habits, ie. Drugs, booze, prostitutes, poor training habits, bad eating habits and distractions outside the ring.. While its true that Tyson fought men who's lifestyle choices were less than perfect, he certainly isn't the only one to face such a crowd. In addition, its unclear as to exactly how much drug use was really going on at the time of his meetings with those men, weather or not they were addicted, how badly it affected them, etc.. Tony Tubbs for example, got busted a few times in his career with traces of Marijuana in his system, so all of a sudden the guy is labeled as a "junky." Getting high on pot every once in a while is hardly what most should consider as a "drug problem", and it certainly doesn't ensure that he will be badly effected in the ring..
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,185
    25,448
    Jan 3, 2007

    I think Muhammad Ali, and possibly Lennox Lewis could beat or at least match that list... Holyfield would come fairly close himself, and Holmes fought a highly comparable roster including half the men who are already on there..But I'm not disputing that its a good list...
     
  15. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,459
    9,449
    Jul 15, 2008
    So they were good but damaged goods for their Tyson bouts? Care to back it up with fact ?

    Berbick was coming off his biggest win.
    Pinklon Thomas was twenty nine and only had one loss, a close decision to Berbick
    Bonecrusher had just koed Witherspoon in a single round
    Tucker just won the title by stopping Buster Douglas
    Briggs was an undefeated former Olympic gold medalist
    Tubbs was thirty years old with only one decision loss on his record.
    Spinks was undefeated former two division champion
    Brunomwas huge, powerful, could box and punch like a monster he would have taken Firpo out in about a minute and would never been allowed in the ring against a Carpentier, a LaStarza, a ****ell or maybe fifteen of Louis' title challengers.