The Myth: Pacquiao has fought the very best

once again i listed the fighters hatton beat after beating zoo..and he fought the weakest fighters at 140 who had a belt...he had cotto and mayweather at 140 when he beat zoo and opted to fight maussa instead:deal

once again do you really want to hang your hat on carlos mausssa:blood you said he unified with maussa how many title defenses did he make of his "unified title" and why did he fight maussa instead of cotto or floyd:deal

and you said hatton beat top contenders at 140 are u serious jose luios castillo was not a top contender at 140, neither was juan lazcano..and urango get the **** out of here.

hatton ducked any threat he could of had at 140 to be lineal from 2005-2009 he somehow missed these guys at 140:

1. floyd mayweather jr:hey
2. miguel cotto:hey
3. Junior witter:hey
4. tim bradley:hey
5. Devon alexander:hey
6. Kendall holt:hey
7. ricardo torres:hey

and wound up fighting:
1. carlos maussa:admin
2. juan urango:admin
3. jose luis castillo:admin
4. juan lazcano:admin
5. paulie malinaggi:admin

 

lineal don't mean your the best just ask zolt eredie:deal

 

maussa was not the only real titleist at the time he had floyd and cotto to fight. and bradley whipped campbell's ass i take it you didn't watch the fight.

I can decide if a guy is smoke and mirrors once again beating zoo did not hatton the best at 140 it gave him an ibf title he had to go out after that and beat the other champs and unify with floyd and cotto to prove he was the best:deal

and you said bradley never beat the best he is the only fighter at 140 conistently beating the best at his weight it damn sure aint ricky hatton or manny pac:hat:nono

 

.

not based on recent comp or accomplishments at the weight the zoo fight was 4 years ago who of any note had he defeated at 140 in that time span.

of course you can you analyze ricky hattons career and it was all hype. after zoo he did nothing at 140.

as the so-called best at 140 he had an obligation to fight the best but he cherry picked around and got accolades for doing that. his fans wanted to proclaim ricky great of one fight and he milked that zoo win for everything it was worth. but did he honestly fight the very best at a140.

you can say he was the top but that don't make it true chief. I already provided you with a list of very dangerous opponents for ricky he deiced to fight the softest fights at 140 malinafggi, maussa, urango, castillo, lazcano don't make me laugh.

he didn't do **** at 147 he made a 147 fighter coming off a brutal beating by clottey fight him at 145. if he was truly interested in fighint the best he would of went straight for mosely.:deal

 

no they did not move up right after hatton beat zoo. zoo lost to hatton in may of 05 floyd beat gatti in june of 05 they had 6 months to make a fight with floyd or cotto but turned down both to fight maussa:deal

and once again hatton won in may floyd won in june why couldn't the fight get made..i will tell you why because hatton was a coward and didn't want to rick his newfound status. the only logical fight at 140 at the time was floyd vs hatton..but ricky fought maussa instead. that is not the best fighter at 140.

hatton beating zoo did not make him the best fighter at 140 all he did was win a title, to be the best he had to beat floyd and other top fighters at 140 to win that distinction.

he decided to live off zoo's reputation rather than build his own..typical coward ****