The Myth: Pacquiao has fought the very best

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ReturnofTheKing, Nov 17, 2009.


  1. ReturnofTheKing

    ReturnofTheKing Member Full Member

    418
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    chief he had 4 years to fight a live body at 140 and refused to do so. I don't care if hatton won the title at 140 I care about who he fought afterward because that is just as important as winning the title who you defend it against.
     
  2. irishny

    irishny Obsessed with Boxing banned

    15,119
    9
    May 8, 2009
    Hatton was hands down the best fighter at 140.
    He beat Tszyu,Malignaggi,Maussa,Urango,Castillo,Lazcano,
    went up and beat Collazo. He beat former champs like Vince Phillips,and contenders like Ben Tackie

    And Bradley has beaten who? Witter in a split decision(decent fighter,thats all) and Holt(So what?),and eh....eh....Ednar Cherry? He didnt beat Campbell. Not yet anyway.
     
  3. Adam H

    Adam H New Member Full Member

    58
    0
    Aug 19, 2009
    hatton moved up in weight to fight floyd so how is that avoiding him? and malignaggi like it or not was ranked number 2 in the division so how was he not fighting the best. dickhead
     
  4. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    Article


    Excerpt:

    **** off RoK.
     
  5. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,291
    15,126
    Dec 6, 2008
    I'll play the game you play on Pacquiao on Bradley.

    1- Holt is a never was.
    2- Campbell? Better, but old (37...) and past it. Bradley thinks he "won" but not quite.
    3- Witter? :lol: Never was and OLD. Didn't even look impressive, got an SD against this dude.

    His resume sucks.
     
  6. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Are you serious homie?:lol: I mean....for reaaaaal??? YOu are buggin! PAC has one of the most impressive and most risky resume of any fighter this era....the only boxer who had more tough challenges on his ledger is Oscar DLH. I mean.....PAC can't fight everyone and given his status at the present time I'd say "Who are we to say his resume doesn't comprise of the very best fighters".....Everyone PAC has faced, beaten and moved passed are all great to VERY GOOD boxers in their own right. PAC beat JMM.....JMM beat Juan Diaz.....So it's not like you can acutally give Juan Diaz a realy shot over PAC....nor Nate. Ricky was the best Jr WW. When PAC destroyed him. I think everyone is still waiting for Floyd to fight the best. PAC has been doing this consistantly for his stint in the US that began 8 or 9 yrs ago.
     
  7. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Ok....now what makes Tim,Kendal, devon, ricardo or Junior better than Ricky? Who have they beat again?:lol:
     
  8. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004

    :good No doubt.
     
  9. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Are all of them better than Cotto too? I mean...>DLH did pretty well lasting 8 rounds with PAC when Cotto and Ricky weren't able to do any better....yet we still go back to DLH being weight drained. I mean......What does PAC gotta do?:rofl
     
  10. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    Check mate
    Pac shouldve agreed to fight Vic at 140 but weigh in at 148
     
  11. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Junior WITTER!:patsch Kendall Holt:patsch.....Nate...OK...I mean he beat Juan DIaz and all....and Ali....but I don't even count that "Win" as a win over Nate...that wasn't a win. And you are a clown to say PAC has been pushed along nicely like he's had some kind of cake walk to becoming the best fighter. And you got Floyd in your avatar!:rofl And I don't even think Floyd ducks cats....he's just in his own world that revolves around money and being the "Pretty boy". So he looks for the low Risk, high reward fights.
     
  12. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Exactly......NO MATTER WHO PAC FAUGHT and who got left out the mix there will be good fighters who didn't get a shot. DLH faught everyone yet still gets bashed for missing a few top guys. PAC has faced MANY top guys and has moved up in weight to face BIGGER challenges with the same if not better skills sets and of course we got haters on the job doing work. It's just funny how transparent these cats are. We got a Floyd hugger yapping about Resumes.....when he's a Floyd fanatic! I mean....Floyd has a very good reusme.....but Floyd is a "GREAT" Talent...supremely skilled boxer and all that overshawdows anyting on his resume which is a shame.
     
  13. angelos

    angelos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,623
    1
    Dec 8, 2007
    Man, every attempt to discredit Pacs accomplishments this days feels like garbage.
     
  14. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    let's go back 4-5 years ago, who would have ever thought a former 106 pounder like pacman would be facing the likes of delahoya, hatton or cotto and destroy each of them? nobody i guess.. it's unimaginable.lol! that alone is already a testament to his greatness.

    pathetic threadstarter is a certified floydette, so no surprises here.
     
  15. pound

    pound Coqui Radar Full Member

    6,791
    9
    Nov 2, 2009

    he would be the GOAT if he fought The Great Argentinian Baldomir