The Nevada State Athletic Commission does not test for HGH and EPO

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bonds, Dec 26, 2009.


  1. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    Yes they do.
    .......................................
    PROHIBITED ACTS; DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS
    NAC 467.850 Administration or use of alcohol, stimulants, drugs or injections; urinalysis or chemical tests; disciplinary action. (
    This content is protected
    )
    1. The administration of or use of any:
    (a) Alcohol;
    (b) Stimulant; or
    (c) Drug or injection that has not been approved by the Commission, including, but not limited to, the drugs or injections listed in subsection 2,
    Ê in any part of the body, either before or during a contest or exhibition, to or by any unarmed combatant, is prohibited.
    2. The following types of drugs, injections or stimulants are prohibited pursuant to subsection 1:
    (a) Afrinol or any other product that is pharmaceutically similar to Afrinol.
    (b) Co-Tylenol or any other product that is pharmaceutically similar to Co-Tylenol.
    (c) A product containing an antihistamine and a decongestant.
    (d) A decongestant other than a decongestant listed in subsection 4.
    (e) Any over-the-counter drug for colds, coughs or sinuses other than those drugs listed in subsection 4. This paragraph includes, but is not limited to, Ephedrine, Phenylpropanolamine, and Mahuang and derivatives of Mahuang.
    (f) Any drug identified on the most current edition of the Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency, which is hereby adopted by reference. The most current edition of the Prohibited List may be obtained, free of charge, at the Internet address www.wada-ama.org.
    3. The following types of drugs or injections are not prohibited pursuant to subsection 1, but their use is discouraged by the Commission:
    (a) Aspirin and products containing aspirin.
    (b) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories.
    4. The following types of drugs or injections are approved by the Commission:
    (a) Antacids, such as Maalox.
    (b) Antibiotics, antifungals or antivirals that have been prescribed by a physician.
    (c) Antidiarrheals, such as Imodium, Kaopectate or Pepto-Bismol.
    (d) Antihistamines for colds or allergies, such as Bromphen, Brompheniramine, Chlorpheniramine Maleate, Chlor-Trimeton, Dimetane, Hismal, PBZ, Seldane, Tavist-1 or Teldrin.
    (e) Antinauseants, such as Dramamine or Tigan.
    (f) Antipyretics, such as Tylenol.
    (g) Antitussives, such as Robitussin, if the antitussive does not contain codeine.
    (h) Antiulcer products, such as Carafate, Pepcid, Reglan, Tagamet or Zantac.
    (i) Asthma products in aerosol form, such as Brethine, Metaproterenol (Alupent) or Salbutamol (Albuterol, Proventil or Ventolin).
    (j) Asthma products in oral form, such as Aminophylline, Cromolyn, Nasalide or Vanceril.
    (k) Ear products, such as Auralgan, Cerumenex, Cortisporin, Debrox or Vosol.
    (l) Hemorrhoid products, such as Anusol-HC, Preparation H or Nupercainal.
    (m) Laxatives, such as Correctol, Doxidan, Dulcolax, Efferyllium, Ex-Lax, Metamucil, Modane or Milk of Magnesia.
    (n) Nasal products, such as AYR Saline, HuMist Saline, Ocean or Salinex.
    (o) The following decongestants:
    (1) Afrin;
    (2) Oxymetazoline HCL Nasal Spray; or
    (3) Any other decongestant that is pharmaceutically similar to a decongestant listed in subparagraph (1) or (2).
    5. An unarmed combatant shall submit to a urinalysis or chemical test before or after a contest or exhibition if the Commission or a representative of the Commission directs him to do so.
    6. A licensee who violates any provision of this section is subject to disciplinary action by the Commission. In addition to any other disciplinary action by the Commission, if an unarmed combatant who won or drew a contest or exhibition is found to have violated the provisions of this section, the Commission may, in its sole discretion, change the result of that contest or exhibition to a no decision.
    [Athletic Comm’n, § 54, eff. 4-25-78]—(NAC A 12-13-82; 12-2-97; R058-05, 12-29-2005; R090-07, 12-4-2007)
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    that just means they're prohibited. Not necessarily tested for.
     
  3. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    i see.
     
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    And if I would of say that, he would be claiming Im an idiot.

    :lol:
     
  5. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    :good, but seriously, I will admit if I'm wrong.
     
  6. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    You are right that Pac should have just told Floyd that he did not want to fight him period.

    I wonder if Pac would retire if random blood testing was mandatory?
     
  7. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    I doubt it.

    He would have new found glory.
     
  8. K-Man

    K-Man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,282
    0
    Apr 24, 2009
    Yes it does. Floyd groupies don't get tired to claim "there is no urine test for EPO, deersinger stearoyds and HGH, so you have to take blood tests!". That is a lie. As simple as that. There are now commercially available tests for all of the claimed substances, and for most of them, ONLY urine tests are scientifically validated and approved. The tests itself exist since 2005. And yes, the guy from the USADA they had in their pockets is a liar too.
     
  9. totsboy

    totsboy Active Member Full Member

    1,150
    0
    Aug 2, 2009
    no wonder why no one posted after this post:p
     
  10. Zacker

    Zacker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,833
    16
    Jun 24, 2009
    I'm quite sure that there is no commercially available urine test for hGH. If you believe otherwise I'd like a reference please.
     
  11. K-Man

    K-Man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,282
    0
    Apr 24, 2009
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
  13. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Because something exist doesn't mean it's used yet.


    So far no one has been able to refute that the NSAC does not test for EPO.
     
  14. Xanthro

    Xanthro Member Full Member

    186
    4
    Jul 25, 2005
    EPO usage can be detected via a urine test. What a urine test cannot determine is effective dose of EPO. That requires a blood test.

    My wife takes EPO twice a week, her urine tests show the results of EPO usage because it affects renal function. Anyone who knows how to read the data can see the EPO usage.

    What is required, is a test before EPO use and a test after EPO use. If someone took EPO at exactly the same period before each test, then EPO usage would be very hard to detect in either blood or urine. You need a baseline.
     
  15. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Wonder why most Pac fans ignore this.