Here's the problem with your post. Mayweather has been a top 10 p4p fighter since 1998. Eventually, all the people in front of him put in bad performances and/or lost. This resulted in him rising to the no.1 spot. Since being in the no.1 spot, he hasn't lost, he hasn't had a bad performance, and his competition has been better than people give him credit for. Paul Williams has never been a top 10 p4p fighter. He'll have to beat a p4p fighter, or at least a legitimate champion before that happens.
Sorry PIMP! Our train is built on an effective track system of reason, logic, and FACTS. Its Fully OPERATIONAL:yep This content is protected
Which one is you again? This content is protected :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl Sorry, couldnt resist you're SUPER FAN mentality
Yeah, there's a lot of people saying that now. Strangely I seem to remember people saying very different things about Hatton in, for example, November 2007.
Joe Calzaghe is better than any version of Floyd at any weight. He is more unpredictable of a fighter. You don't see people catching and avoiding Calzaghe's punches like they do Mayweathers (when his opponents possess a defence of some sort).
Not gonna jump on just yet. But I am not happy about the DLH rematch. I tire of the political excuses of why a Cotto fight isn't happening. At least one top 10 WW should be on his resume by now, but as it is, this will be the 3rd fight since his WW title was won, and he hasn't fought a WW yet. If he rematches Hatton after this, then we will need a cruise ship, not a train to hold all the passengers.
You blatantly cling to moot points, twist and distort truth, and in doing so you are losing what little credibility you have, and all over a petty disliking of mayweather. Floyd's universally regarded as the #1 pound-for-pound fighter in the sport. Anyone who can label that as underachieving needs to re-evaluate themselves.
This makes no sense. Yes, FLoyd's the #1 P4p fighter. But are you going to just keep him there if he takes DLH II, Hatton II and Pac? :huh