THE OFFICIAL fight night in pictures Marquez vs PAC III

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by timeout, Nov 15, 2011.


  1. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    U clearly didn't see clottey....


    Ahhh yeah ur a 29 post tool...
     
  2. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    My logic is that both fighters are notorious bruisers. My logic is that if JMM was actually landing effective punches Pac's face should show it. My logic is that most of what people thought were clean effective punches by JMM were weak arm punches with no body behind them. Is my logic that flawed. We have two fighters notoriously prone to bruising. One looks beat to **** the other looks fine. Since they are equal in how easy they bruise the only conclusion can be that the bruised up one lost.
     
  3. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    thats too much logic for these JMM and ***** ***s.:patsch
    cotto won too u know:patsch

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  4. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    :good

    This is thread they avoid bro
     
  5. ovechkin8crosby

    ovechkin8crosby Active Member Full Member

    807
    0
    Jul 4, 2011
  6. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    Who nesh???!!!

    This is a ***** jmm free zone.
     
  7. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    Reminder of a whoooping marqueer took
     
  8. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  9. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    Juan Manuel "Klingon" Marquez

    This content is protected


    "I win three times yes?!?"
     
  10. bobotnaman

    bobotnaman ★★★★☆ Full Member

    3,884
    1
    Sep 8, 2011
    pictures from 1st page, i can say that Marquez can now take Pac's punches.
     
  11. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    This picture right here is crazy. They should check Pacquiao's wraps for calcium sulfate.
     
  12. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010
    Damn.. I thought this troll thread had been well and truly shut down. :think

    Trolls just keep on trollin'!

    I urge anyone who's interested to read the entire thread for some ownage. :deal
     
  13. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006

    :lol:
     
  14. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    Pictures of fight night is trolling now?

    Just because they show ur man marqueer getting his melon head slapped up.:patsch
     
  15. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010

    It is trolling. Because, as I explained to you several times, a few snapshots from a 12 round fight doesn't prove anything either way. Someone could have done a thread just showing Marquez landing shots. Would that prove that you that Marquez won it? No. But you were claiming this **** as proof.

    Pacquiao landed some lovely shots. I have no problem with the thread as long as you recognise that it doesn't prove who won or lost the fight. :conf