THE OFFICIAL fight night in pictures Marquez vs PAC III

No one really is. Its the *****s who are creating a strawman. Compubox just confirms what I saw in the ring. I had my score card well before I saw any compubox numbers. Compubox normally inflates both fighters numbers. I'm sure it did in this case as well.

 

Tru Dat

 

Ah yes.. don't quote all of my post so you can ignore half of it.

They can hurt more when you're opponent is coming in, walking onto them, sometimes lunging onto them, exactly like Pacquaio was. Pacquiao said after the fight he was hurt several times. :good

Never said rounds weren't scored round by round. And that second sentance doesn't make any sense whatsoever. The punching is too close..? :huh

I have Sky+, on a 50" tv, pausing and rewinding as I needed to. I took note of everything that landed and didn't land, don't worry
And yeah, your eyes are lovely, Wendy. :roll:

I never said the rules required constant aggression, your comprehension is rather poor. I was making the point that people say Pac won because he was the aggressor all night. It was more like 50-50. They were both very cautious for most of the fight.

Yes, he got the 'crap' beaten out of him. Just not KO'd.. or knocked down.. or hurt more than once or twice. Please.


You are complete fail. You can't make a point without saying 'I'm better than you at this and that, I know more about this and that with you' or using that stupid 'strawman' bull****. If your point can't stand up on it's own I guess that says something.

Why don't you tell me again why Pacquaio's a better counter puncher than Mayweather?

 

It's relevant because of JMM's predisposition to swelling. Watch his fights on youtube if you don't want to take my word for it. He swells in every fight, he always looks awful afterwards. But this doesn't tell you how many punches he's taken or how hard he's been hit, what don't you understand about that? Feather fisted fighters have made him swell ffs. atsch

 

Funny. But again, not true and completely irrelevant to the conversation here. Try to make yourself useful timeout, come on.

 

dont waste your time with this ******.Take his word or the word of the people that actually box for a living that thought marquez won.Simple as that.

 

You know what kind of hurt I'm talking about. You are playing semantics.

Yes there were many rounds where you cant score it based on purely dominate punching and defense. Most of the rounds were that way. That is why there is also ring generalship and effective aggression. I'm sorry that once again you prove too stupid to score a fight.

Once again your word vs. mine. You have no evidence to back up your big mouth. And any evidence that backs up me is irrelevant according to you. You lying sack of ****.

50-50? Is that some kind of a joke? JMM was the aggressor half the time? Tell me do you even bother to look at how ridiculous some of the claims you have been making about this fight are? You are a ****ing dumbass. You will say anything no matter how false.

Did you not see all the counter right hooks in that slim period of time JMM tried to take the offensive. It was very short because he was getting countered to death. Perhaps you missed it we all know that you eye is slow and JMM didn't keep it up for very long.

Remove the plank from your own eye. You are all talk. You have no stats no pictures, or anything else to support your assertions. Anything I have you call irrelevant. You are just a lying piece of ****. Every time you are caught you just lie your ass off. First you were saying that Manny didn't land, then you say you never said that 'Many didn't land any punches', now you say that JMM was the aggressor 50% of the time. You are a lying dumb****!

Honestly I have no trouble if anyone scored the fight 115-113 for Marquez my card could have well gone that way ... but you ... you are a lying piece of ****. You have made some many ridiculous assertions and then double backed every time you are called on it you are nothing but a scum.

We've been over this ... effectiveness .. Mayweather has yet to drop a welterweight with a counter punch. You socre sizzle I score steak. You can bring it up as much as you like I stand by it. You are just a piece of **** who knows you are losing the argument.

 

Temper temper Wendy. :nono

It's just a forum, don't get all riled up now. Read my entire post again, you'll find there's already a counter claim there to everything you just wrote. The problem is you just won't accept and/or don't understand what you're reading. Anything can be twisted whatever way you see fit to try and make your point, and you're doing a lot of twisting. Here are the main points again, put simply, since you don't seem to understand.

1. Pacquiao wasn't half as aggressive as you think he was. Very very cautious for large parts of the fight, and understandably so, as he was getting caught almost every time he came forward throwing. He wasn't cautious for all of it course, but neither was JMM. Again, walking after somebody does not constitute aggression. This was the least Aggressive I've seen Pacquaio in years.

2. JMM was more aggressive than you think he was. Many, many times, he initiated the first exchange, watch it again. Saying 'Manny was the aggressive one, he wins!' is too simplistic and doesn't cut it I'm afraid.

3. Here's the definition of Ring Generalship from the New York State Athletic Commission :

Actually, on the night JMM did everything in that definition.

Yes, ring generalship is a vital part of scoring a round, and JMM was the ring general all night.

4. I never said Manny didn't land at all. Show me where I said that. And you call me a liar?

5. 60-70% of the forum agree that JMM won it. A lot of boxers and trainers think he won it. I'm not saying you that should make you change your mind of course, but maybe you should just ask yourself.. if all those people in the fight game, and so many people here think he did, maybe there's something to it. Have a look at dangerousity's scoring thread. He knows how to score a round unbiasedly and with a lot of detail and came up with JMM as the winner. And he's a Pacquiao fan.

If you could refrain from calling me a lying piece of ****, that'd be nice. All the swearing and "its your word against mine" nonsense makes you look like a childish fool. You've taken a personal dislike to me, that's fine. But I have no need to lie about anything here, just calling it like I see it, facts are facts.

 

It's funny how all the pics up here is only showing what Pac did to Marquez. Where's the clean shots Marquez was hitting Pac with through out the night? It's obvious the thread starter is a Pocahontas fan.

 

This content is protected