The official "I called Hopkins over Pavlik thread!"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bronx, Oct 19, 2008.


  1. Small Print

    Small Print All Lies Full Member

    360
    2
    Jul 23, 2008
    My first decent prediction. :)
     
  2. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    i thought kelly would win it too.

    if anyone bet on hopkins winning this stylishly they deserve their winnings.
     
  3. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    thats true, its shocking how the Americans basically abandoned Bhop before the fight, and now they are all saying what a legend he is.
     
  4. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
  5. Bonavena25

    Bonavena25 Vamos! Full Member

    4,778
    1
    Nov 2, 2007
    I called it several times. I said Hopkins would make it look ridicously easy and he did.
     
  6. getup

    getup Say Yeah! Full Member

    1,131
    4
    Aug 15, 2004
    its one thing to just pick a fight its a whole other to get paid for your predictions..,


    100...200...300...400...,etc...,:yep
     
  7. Uppercut83

    Uppercut83 The Quitschkos are bums Full Member

    4,209
    1
    Jun 28, 2008
  8. Bonavena25

    Bonavena25 Vamos! Full Member

    4,778
    1
    Nov 2, 2007
    This is what I said after the countdown:

    "I'm thinking of this fight, watching the countdown, and am more convinced than ever that B-Hop will win this fight.

    The Pavlik camp seem wary - Jack Leow says he expects the fight to be competitive and up in the air after six, and Kelly himself is saying how will Hopkins react against a natural 160 pounder rather than pointing out real tangible weaknesses. Surely the fight being at 170 ibs will negate Pavlik's metronomic power and render it not as effective?

    So, with that said, we will be left with a pure boxing match and this is where Hopkins prevails IMO. Not by alot, as Pavlik is no mug himself at boxing, but enough to eek out a decision by virtue of forcing Pavlik to change plans numerous times along the way and exposing each one in his own unimitable way.

    On that subject of plans, I'm still not convinced Pavlik can switch plans with enough seamless authority to pull this fight out. His change of strategy halfway through second Taylor fight worked but it still doesn't wholly convince that he'll be able to do likewise versus Hopkins.

    So, if Hopkins can just keep up a similar level of conditioning as he did versus Calzaghe I think he'll take it. He faded against Calzaghe but there is no one in boxing that throws as many punches as him so he should be able to 'bluff' things better this time if Pavlik comes on strong late on and give a better impression of putting on a "boxing clinic" to the judges, with quotation marks or not, depending on your stance regarding B-Hops style.

    Hopkins UD."

    Okay, didn't expect to be that easy at time of this post but by friday I did.
     
  9. Gatekeeper78

    Gatekeeper78 Active Member Full Member

    674
    0
    Jul 28, 2008
    The closer it came to the fight I was sayin that I dont see Kelly landing his hard right againt Hopkins, and he didn't.
     
  10. AbbasKhan6428

    AbbasKhan6428 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,810
    0
    Jun 2, 2008
    same dude:good:good
     
  11. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Picked Hopkins UD but he did it in a more demolishing manner than I thought
     
  12. Tencount85

    Tencount85 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,372
    1
    May 21, 2007
    I picked Hopkins to get the nod. I just thought Hopkins had more dimensions to him as a fighter and that would've enabled him to get the win.
     
  13. Bonavena25

    Bonavena25 Vamos! Full Member

    4,778
    1
    Nov 2, 2007
    :rofl "old *******"
     
  14. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,073
    27,775
    Jul 26, 2004
    I picked pavlik because watching the joe c fight i felt hopkins was there to be beat by a big, strong, powerpunching fighter like pavlik who comes forward throwing punches all night... but when pavlik didnt have a target to throw at, he stopped punching, and hopkins showed up the best hopkins ive seen in... i dont know when, and totally dominated. I am happy as hell for him...

    but nobody should feel embarresed they picked pavlik over a 43 year old hopkins who hasnt looked impressive in a few fights... it was the natural pick imo.
     
  15. gilad

    gilad Active Member Full Member

    577
    10
    Mar 4, 2006
    I called it. Knew the skill difference is huge but because of Bernard's age and stamina issues didn't see such a wide margin. I knew that even at 43, B-Hop didn't lose enough to lose to such a basic fighter. I knew for sure Pavik's not on the Calzaghe level.