[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8qiZnrJrQ4[/ame] RD1 10-9 PAC RD2 9-10 MARQUEER [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hwSDJvq-SI[/ame] RD 3 10-9 PAC [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLmpGYGH04w[/ame] RD 4 10-9 PAC :good:good:good After 4rds 39-37 Educating ESB on how to score a fight.:deal
Some of those punches pointed out for Pac seems to be only grazing, so I put those out of the equation. But Pac still nicks it :think The haters dispute the relevance of photos showing swelling around the eyes of Marqueez, as well as comp bux numbers and the official judges scorecard. All such things melts down to nothing compared with their superior ability to score a boxing match. Now I wonder, what acutally happened during the ****ing rounds, can they write that off as well? :huh
No no, let timeout post his little pictures and things. Makes him and his ******* friends feel better. I'm all for averting suicide. :good
As usual. U got butt hurt JMM and *****tards coming in here, not offering one rebuttal to the videos. Just insults and poor comical taste. Is it because its irrefutable? Good.atschatschatsch This content is protected
It could be, if he'd scored it without the biased captions on the video. It's funny how many of Pacquiao's shots are captioned as 'Hidden'. :roll: 'Hidden jab' etc etc, some of which you can't even see. Some of which are questionable as solid scoring punches. If you caption things, you're colouring it, just like a commentary does when watching on tv etc. Watching a completely unbiased slow mo without any captions is the only way to do it fairly.
Even if you lift out the grazing shots and "hidden" jabs Pac still nics it. I excluded five such questionmarks all together. Or are their punches landed by Marquez that are not pointed out in the vidoes?
Your right it is completely subjective.atsch:rofl If you like licking ***** and JMM balls.atsch:rofl :hammertimewha: