The official Mayweather vs. Pacquiao aftermath trash receptacle

if I went by this video it would tighten up my score card.

 

Saying this does not make it true

What are your objections to the video?

The methodology is flawless, show every single contact during the 12 rounds and pause on shots that connected and count them.

Using basic math and reason we can deduct who won the majority of the rounds

You can't reason with facts m8, or you can but this means you are a fool

 

Yes because counting the punches connected is far easier at full speed ,slowing down the action might be counter productive to the goal of actually seeing what lands and what not
atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch atsch

 

Because it is an edited 10 minute video, compiling the moments from the fight that the creator of the video wants you to see.

There is plenty to disagree with in this video. Please don't ask me to list them, because I won't. There are that many and they are that obvious.

You claiming the video as factual and citing basic math as your reasoning for decisively factually scoring rounds (while only seeing the select clips of each round the creator of the video wants you to see) is an utter joke... my lord, why am I even wasting my time with this troll?

 

I guess you should get your eyes checked, Mrs. CJ Ross.

 

You are incorrect, this video shows every possible contact during the fight so counting the punches landed in this 10 minutes video actually accurately determines the boxer that scored more during the fight.

You can't refute this or at least you didn't until now

 

[face palm]

dsr a special kind of stupid.

 

Right because attacking me instead of the irrefutable argument I just presented one message above will help your case sure

atsch atsch atsch atsch

 

He's right though. All you have to do to prove him wrong is show any point of the fight where punches are exchanged that are not in the video.

You have the easiest job here.

 

1:09 of the horrible video... counts a Pacquiao body shot which, at best, partially connected with his wrist.

The very first right hand that Floyd throws in Round 1 is not counted. By the standard of counting that body shot from Pac, Floyds' first right hand is also certainly a landing blow.

Wow. That took literally no more than 2 minutes, including typing this message.

 

If you think boxing is only scored on the total number of times each boxer hits the other, you literally know nothing about boxing. I don't know who hit the other the most. What I do know is Mayweather won the fight: both in the ring and on the scorecards. Time to move on 'champ' and stop talking about a retired boxer.

 

Thanks for doing the video DSR. I have also watched this fight in slow mo and also counted the punches. I have floyd landing 109 and manny 119.
I was at this fight and scored it a draw....after doing my own review again scored it a draw.

Compubox had this at floyd 148 manny 81 iirc which is baffling to anyone who has reviewed the fight in slow mo, a lot of floyds shots cannot be counted when watching in real time look like scoring shots.

I can't be bothered with the arguments you get on here but I'm from the uk and impartial with my scoring.
Believe what you want but I saw this more like DSR than what the commentators were saying so did my own review. I would encourage anyone to do the same, it's easy on a laptop using vcl.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

I personally don't care who won nor do I intend to argue with you. I moved past this a long time ago and treat it no different than any other fight that is politically influenced. I simply pointed out that you said you could easily dismiss the entire video based on the argument you made yet for some reason decide not to. I don't know why you brought up something entirely different for your response.

 

I know how a fight is scored we all know what the judges final result was


Regarding total number of punches landed we can all see in the video who dominated it is Pac by a large margin. I like that you conceded this point and you want to make a case of why Floyd won because of other scoring standards, you are more then welcomed to make your case.

 

I liked that you conceded that this video is legit and clearly shows who won

You now moved on to argue about the validity of the punches being counted, this is your second valid way of disregarding the argument that Pac won

You did not make your case yet, you called the video horrible (probably because the end result is in direct contradiction with your belief of who won the fight) and pointed 2 shots that you disagree with, this is not enough for anyone to even consider your point because the number of points counted you argue against is way too low and does not change the overall result.