Here's mine. I gave the 1st to Berto based on this (Im taking this from konundrum who said it best) The first round was very close and could have gone either way. In my opinion Berto was not hurt in the 1st, Collazo caught him cleanly when he was off balance and he fell back, which led to a brief rally by Collazo. It all comes down to whether or not you thought Berto was "hurt." I felt like he was stunned and of balance, but not necessarily "hurt." I felt that Berto won the first part of the 1st round... then after the impressive rally from Collazo, Berto came right back and was the better man for the final minute of the round. I have no problem with someone giving this round to Collazo of course. Had I given it to Collazo my card would have been 114-113 for Berto, which is probably the exact way 2 of the 3 judges saw it. (I see it the exact same way he said this) 1. 10-9 Berto 2. 10-9 Berto 3. 9-10 Collazo 4. 8-10 Collazo 5. 10-9 Berto 6. 10-9 Berto 7. 10-9 Berto 8. 10-9 Berto 9. 9-10 Collazo 10. 9-10 Collazo 11. 10-9 Berto 12. 10-9 Berto And 116-111 was a bad scorecard.
Its the mentality that a certain fighter has to be judged to win a round that causes controversy. I think if there was more 10-10 rounds then we would see less controversial decisions. As far as I'm concerned, a fighter needs to clearly win a round to earn that extra point.
114-113 Berto... 1. 9-10 Collazo 2. 10-9 Berto 3. 9-10 Collazo 4. 8-10 Collazo 5. 10-9 Berto 6. 10-9 Berto 7. 10-9 Berto 8. 10-9 Berto 9. 9-10 Collazo 10. 9-10 Collazo 11. 10-9 Berto 12. 10-9 Berto It was not a robbery. It was a close fight that could have went either way. 114-113 is an acceptable score for Collazo as well.
Here's mine: 1. 10-9 Collazo 2. 10-9 Berto 3. 9-10 Collazo 4. 8-10 Collazo 5. 10-9 Collazo 6. 10-9 Collazo 7. 10-9 Berto 8. 10-9 Berto 9. 9-10 Collazo 10. 9-10 Collazo 11. 10-9 Berto 12. 10-9 Berto 115-112 Collazo
115-112 Collazo ... all out robbery ... I don't think that Berto did enough to win that fight at all.
Those are the pivotal rounds. The others, imo, were pretty clear. Like I said, a 114-113 score is defensible - precisely because of those two rounds. The 116-111 score was ridiculous. What irks me is that these HBO house fighters - Taylor is the worst example of this - get decisions in fights the other guy would have certainly lost if they had performed the way they did. There isn't a level playing field in this sport.
10-9 Collazo 10-9 Berto 10-9 Collazo 10-8 Collazo 10-9 Collazo 10-9 Berto 10-9 Berto 10-9 Berto 10-9 Collazo 10-9 Collazo 10-9 Berto 10-9 Berto 114-113 Collazo