The Official "Re-Score Froch Vs Dirrell" Thread...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by walk with me, Oct 20, 2009.


  1. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    Okay.. this is how this is going to go down...


    i'm going to post a segment of the fight from youtube and i wont post the next segment until at least 6 people score that segment.... then i will repost the next segment..and after 6 more people score that segment.. i will post the next segment.. and continue this trend until we get to the final rounds of the fight and after that we will tally up the over all score and get a nice balanced discussion and view point on how this fight really played out

    the only rule...
    This content is protected



    Part 1...

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATrAhwIclhw[/ame]
     
  2. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    guess nobody is interested

    well for me

    1- froch
    2- dirrell
    3- direll
     
  3. Stezzie

    Stezzie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,277
    1
    Dec 23, 2004
    First 2 rounds Dirrell...Froch barely even touch Direll. 20 to 18 Direll at the start of 3
     
  4. Stezzie

    Stezzie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,277
    1
    Dec 23, 2004

    I cant even see how you gave Froch the first round...what did he land? Do you not count Dirrells body work? Do you only count Froch shots to the body...?
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    1. Dirrell - better jab, more accurate, very close
    2. Dirrell - wider than the second but still close
    3. Dirrell - Dirrell starts to throw more power shots and lands them
     
  6. DAVEMAKER

    DAVEMAKER Member Full Member

    442
    0
    Sep 1, 2009
    1. froch
    2. dirrell
    3. even
     
  7. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    i honestly didnt even watch the youtube clip.. i just remember this being how i felt about it during the actually happening during the fight... im doing this while im kind of busy at the moment but i will participate later

    oh you just reminded me
     
  8. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    R1 - Dirrell: Froch did next to nothing (am I missing jabs he landed??), Dirrell had the better jab and had a couple decent counters. No running/effective aggression factor.

    R2 - Dirrell: Dirrell landed only meaningful punches (counters) and his evasiveness (without running) was very good. Can't credit Froch for any effective aggression.

    Supposed to do R3? Nothing happens in this clip, but Dirrell does start the running. The tap on the break is inconsequential.
     
  9. DAVEMAKER

    DAVEMAKER Member Full Member

    442
    0
    Sep 1, 2009
    of what?
     
  10. mgdb26

    mgdb26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,352
    4
    May 11, 2009
    Dirrell easily won the first four rounds, I gave the fifth to him also but the fifth is debatable. In the first four rounds Froch didn't land anything and Dirrell landed almost all of his punches.
     
  11. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    no even rounds..... judges never do even rounds.... i personally don't believe there is such a thing
     
  12. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    1 Dirrell

    2 Dirrell

    3 Dirrell
     
  13. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    round 1 = 5 dirrell votes vs 1 froch votes
    round 2 = 6 dirrell votes vs 0 froch votes
    round 3 = 4 dirrell votes vs 0 froch votes & 2 Even (which i hope will be fixed)


    lets keep getting in more results


    edit: just added cubex
     
  14. 1 Hitta Quitta

    1 Hitta Quitta Active Member Full Member

    1,155
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    I just watched this fight again last night and I see it being a little bit closer than the first time I saw it. Either way it was pretty clear cut to me that Dirrel won the fight, BUT also he didnt stand out enough to make a clear victory so I see why they robbed him. I mean if you travel all that way to fight, winning isnt enough, you got to whoop ass. He was scoring like crazy and making Froch look stupid but Froch was the aggressor and was landing a nice shot from time to time. I liked how Dirrel fought in the last couple rounds. Well, to make a long story short even with the point deduction I would have Dirrel winning by 2 rounds. Originally I had Dirrel winning by 4 with the deduction but watching the fight again and taking some aspects into consideration I think it was closer. Froch will be horribly exposed before this tourney is over, Dirrel let this one pass him by and he had everything he needed to win this fight...he shouldnt have left any doubt in anyones head..he left a tad bit too much to get a victory overseas.
     
  15. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    From the first 3 I only see the 2nd as being arguable for Froch.