The Official "Re-Score Froch Vs Dirrell" Thread...

What are you talking about?There were toss up rounds(the 12th comes to mind).

 

I thought the 12th was a clear Dirrell round. The middle rounds and the first round had some toss up rounds I think.

 

1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 were all extremely close rounds. The 12th less so, but still.

 

well then your wrong

 

Depends what you like.

The first minute nad a half where Dirrell does the work with flasy but IMO ineffective stuff or the fina lminute nad a half when Froch comes on and pressures him and lands a few nice ones himself.

Live I scored it for Dirrell.Rewatching it I gave it to Froch.

 

Same for me.:good 1.Froch. 2 and 3 Dirrell

I've just scored the fight again watching on tv and had exactly the same score as when I was at the arena, although by slightly different route, which was 116-113 Froch

 

Great idea, bro. I'd always wanted to see a thread like this. Go over the rounds and dare mother ****ers to say fighter "A" won it when we can all see together that fighter "B" actually did.:good

Dirrell swept 1-3..:deal

 

To be honest, this has hit some weird-ass geeky level similar to a Star Trek convention where people argue over translations from an alien language. At least with this topic, people bleed.

 

Wait a ****in' MINUTE!!!:shock::shock::shock:

If I'm gonna continue to participate in this thread, you gonna have to tell me just how on EARTH you could possibly give round 1 to Froch.

Watch it again and tell me with no bull **** that Froch landed more than 2 CLEAN punches...while Dirrell landed many.

 

1-Froch 1 was tuff to score nobody did much.
2-Dirrel
3-Dirrel

 

4. Dirrell

5.Drawn. If a round is level it's level. Giving a drawn round to one or the other fighter produces wide disparities in the final tallies which is why we often get scores such as 117-112 112-117 116-113.

6.Froch

 

I'm with you - can't see this going to Froch. Dirrell landed more and more significant and you can't credit Froch with any aggression.