The Official Running Tally of Blatant Robberies & Dodgy Decisions Thread.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by CST80, Apr 5, 2023.


  1. Pepsi Dioxide

    Pepsi Dioxide Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,017
    10,471
    Oct 22, 2020
    I honestly wonder if in the age we are living in, there couldn't be a website or a movement to have boxers' records updated to reflect what the decision should of been. Similar to a newspaper decision of the early 1900s compared to a bunch of No contests/no decisions
     
    sasto and CST80 like this.
  2. titanic

    titanic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,599
    3,939
    Aug 7, 2016
    Agree. I miss the Ali and Fab 4 days.
     
    CST80 likes this.
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    237,830
    227,921
    Nov 23, 2013
    6/3/23 - Ardreal Holmes vs. Wendy Toussaint - Holmes SD

    Holmes second gift decision this year.:ohno
     
    rl2 and Pepsi Dioxide like this.
  4. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    237,830
    227,921
    Nov 23, 2013
    6/10/23 - Sunny Edwards vs. Andres Campos - Edwards UD
     
    Snails likes this.
  5. DramaShow

    DramaShow 19 banned Full Member

    6,673
    6,403
    Dec 22, 2020
    Not a robbery, Campos didn’t win in my opinion, but horrible scorecards.
     
  6. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    237,830
    227,921
    Nov 23, 2013
    Yeah well, I vehemently disagree, as do many others. You were giving him way too much credit, for rounds he did **** all in.
     
    Snails likes this.
  7. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    237,830
    227,921
    Nov 23, 2013
    6/10/23 - Jaime Munguía vs. Sergiy Derevyanchenko - Munguia UD

    Goddamn... they just love robbing Ukrainians don't they?
     
    Perkin Warbeck likes this.
  8. NullaLexInk

    NullaLexInk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,558
    4,518
    Mar 10, 2022
    There's one Ukrainian they won't able to rob :ggg
     
    sasto and CST80 like this.
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,818
    45,527
    Mar 21, 2007
    Not a robbery.
     
    Noel857 and DramaShow like this.
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,818
    45,527
    Mar 21, 2007
    Also not a robbery - nobody is using that word about this fight so far as I can see. The amalgamation websites have it a point either way. Hard to think of a more obvious "any close card is fine fight" tbh, although I did see it by a point to Sergiy I also scored him the seventh, and it was so, so close.

    This thread is basically a tally of occasions where your scorecards diverge from the official scorecards, which is fair enough given how many fights you score, but I don't know how "Official" it is. Paints a false image for me.
     
  11. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    237,830
    227,921
    Nov 23, 2013
    Apparently you missed the second part of the thread title.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,818
    45,527
    Mar 21, 2007
    You called the fight a robbery:

    To be honest though, neither decision can even be called dodgy for my money. It does raise the point, worth maybe identifying whether you are denoting it a robbery or a dodgy decision when you list them - or even put it on a sliding scale, 5 being Whitaker-Chavez, 1 being Sergiy-Munguia (as I see it).
     
    DramaShow likes this.
  13. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    237,830
    227,921
    Nov 23, 2013
    Most on here thought Derevyanchenko should've won even with the knockdown, including myself and that's a opinion I've seen shared by many across the web. So to say it was a robbery is far from some egregious stretch. Most of Derevyanchenko's losses have been one round difference type affairs, that many have been bitching about for years, this is another one of those type matches. So go scold all of the people who thought GGG, Adames, Jacobs and even Charlo got gifts too, and there's plenty of them. So I disagree with you once again.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,818
    45,527
    Mar 21, 2007
    It is an egregious stretch. Claiming a fight that most people had extremely close is a robbery - that is, that a crime was perpetrated against the loser - is not fair, especially to the winner. I saw round seven as a round that should be scored even under most sensible scoring systems but I had to score it one way or the other and preferred Sergiy but if I had seen one punch differently in that round i'd have had it by the same score to Derevyanchenko. For all that you've seen many across the web scoring it one way, there are also many scoring it the other.

    The most important thing that needs to be recognised with these fights is that they can look different ringside. It's horrible the way people watching on tv - sometimes even on their phones - will start screaming robbery when the fights can look so very different ringside. I've seen fights with huge swings from ringside versus television, it is crazy.

    I think, you'd have to admit, that you've done more of the scolding where this decision is concerned over the last 24hrs that I have. Either way, hopefully, contrary opinions can be made welcome.

    My point is just that a) you don't seem to look into ringside reporting where these supposed robberies are concerned and that's a shame and b) two fights you've listed this weekend are generating 0 heat in the industry itself. Nobody is describing these fights as a robberies anywhere but our RBR and Twitter. The reason for this is that the fight was very close and any close card is fine. Munguia got two of them, so he won. That's just the sport.

    114-113, either way, is the optimum, I like a card for Sergiy best based upon what I saw on TV but by the narrowest of possible margins, literally a punch.
     
    lufcrazy likes this.
  15. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    237,830
    227,921
    Nov 23, 2013
    It's a debatable decision, I doubt any reasonable person would disagree with that, so therefore it goes on this thread, like every other sketchy or dodgy decision. That's all I have to say on the matter, and I'm not going to be drawn into this utterly pointless ouroboros like hair splitting discussion.