The Paradigm Shift: Floyd Mayweather beats Sugar Ray Robinson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Gannicus, Aug 17, 2015.


  1. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    I don't like Floyd, you guys know that. SRR could well be GOAT.

    Virtually all say Floyd beat Maidana by just 1 round, or drew (in the first fight).

    Imagine Floyd...
    110-1-2 instead of 45-0, tougher gloves, hit more with them (his defense wasn't the best), era where gameplan = go for KO (his style was the master of that), fought big fights once every three weeks, even once a week sometimes.
    All those years, physical conditioning adapts to tough schedule and thus not near physical optimum, carries injuries into fights, no sports science-inspired nutrition advantages (no legal supplements that function like PED's either), shunning importance of recovery and its optimisation, no long training camps for honing craft responsibly, no specialised technical sparring to adjust to future opponent.

    If Floyd (who fought 9 times in 2014) with his own style then fought Maidana with all of those factors considered, HE WOULD LOSE.


    The Garry Russell Jr-Jeff Lacy Complex
    SRR on tape = product of all the conditions mentioned.

    Gary fighting bums = looks impressive, amazing combos.
    Faces Lomachenko (fast twitch maestro, highly skilled) = showstopping combos look like pointless harmless flurries, Gary looks weaker.
    We overblow their abilities by filling in the blanks ourselves i.e 'Gary is fast, has powerful combinations...therefore it IS good enough to trouble the best fighters'.

    SRR's opponents = going for KO, not very defensively responsible, compromised fundamentals.
    Not outpointing-by-not-fighting, not even mastering the art of outpointing-by-fighting.


    Conclusion
    SRR = poorly conditioned compared to Mayweather. There's levels to this, Mayweather is echelons > SRR in terms of athletic abilities etc.
    The fight is not won or lost by pure athleticism alone, but when you have two of the very best up against eachother, it's a chess match. If you're failing badly in a certain area, you're not prepped at the level to pay grandmaster chess. Athleticism on the fundamental level allows you to do things you want to do.

    Imagine Floyd fights 10 times by next August. He'd be finished. Morales was past it by age 28 after wars with softer gloves.
    ....But we are going to magically imagine SRR is not human and can take so many beatings and still be the same.


    I don't really think Floyd beats SRR, but you have to be neutral and present compelling arguments.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2017
  2. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Independent to the first post, not necessary to read just yet:

    There's a few heads to this concept of athleticism:
    1. Sugar Ray was in a grueling schedule that wears down on the body, which also includes fighting once every three weeks.
    Even when fighters OVERTRAIN today, it shows notably on their performance.
    2. The way this schedule renders SRR's athleticism overall. It has an incremental effect and conditions him differently to a fighter like Mayweather who conditions himself optimally for any given fight.
    3. If you're not recovering the right way and optimising recovery times, taking good care so as to prevent long term damage, you're shortening your RING AGE.
    4. Nutrition.
    5. Using your prime athleticism when you're under those conditions is fine if you're fighting someone else under those same conditions, but when you're against someone who uses prime, optimal athleticism, under different conditions...good luck seeing how far your athleticism takes you!

    I don't really think Floyd beats SRR, but you have to be neutral and present compelling arguments.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2017
  3. YesMySon

    YesMySon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    13
    Aug 12, 2015
    If cocaine was something they tested for, or if the easter bunny brought Floyd joy the right toys. Or if Santa put young srr on his naughty list then maybe Floyd would lose to maidana.

    Or if dinosaurs were still around being ridden by elves sugar ray Robinson would be the best lhw of all time.
     
  4. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    This thread isn't for you. It's for knowledgeable boxing fans who thus like to reflect.
     
  5. Jake LaMotta

    Jake LaMotta Lights Out Full Member

    7,293
    1,482
    Jan 3, 2015
    TL;DR: Idiotic to compare Floyd and Sugar Ray and it's embarrassing to say he would beat him. Floyd isn't fit to lace Sugar Ray's boots.
     
  6. Nah... I prefer to look forward & not speculate on things that would involve a time machine! Floyd Mayweather doesn't beat SRR because he's long dead lol
     
  7. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,188
    13,231
    Feb 13, 2014
    I think it's an interesting thought and I understand the point you're illustrating. If you ask me, one of the reasons boxers fight a lot less (especially at the top) is because it allows fight hype to build momentum and ring in extra money. Of course, fighting less will make you last longer in terms of actual time but then you've had a load less fights ergo less chance to prove yourself against more competition.

    The argument could work both ways. Despite not having the conditioning people have now, SRR was THAT good he'd still whoop all of today's era back then. It's just so difficult to compare boxing now and then as they're run so differently (for better or worse I sometimes wonder).

    Hope I actually got the point you're trying to make, and that mine was clear enough to understand back.
     
  8. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    This is the very typical wording that seems to stem from connecting imaginary dots (no dig).
    How would SRR from the tapes we've seen beat Floyd?
     
  9. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    The money and momentum is true, but imagine Timothy Bradley fighting 12 times in 2014, considering the Provodnikov fight. Imagine he's in an era where they really try to go for the KO, Bradley tries to do the same and take many shots, with tougher gloves. He's going to be somewhat burned out (compared to what he usually is) going into a championship fight with Floyd Mayweather.
    Tim would have certain great ideas on how he'd want to implement his strategy, but he won't be able to actually follow through.

    Proving yourself against top competition is a double edged sword, you'd beaten decent guys but you'd have probably taken some big beatings from them too which weighs you down.

    I don't see how SRR who's athletic expression being echelons inferior, would whoop the very elite new timers...unless they were come forward fighters who almost exclusively outpoint-by-fighting.

    I haven't even got to breaking down an SRR-Mayweather matchup yet.
     
  10. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,188
    13,231
    Feb 13, 2014
    I'm not sure how or why, but fighters of days gone by certainly seem a lot more tough. They did fight way more, but also went the 15 rounds quite regularly too whereas you see a lot of guys gassed by the 12th round even at the top level of fighter here.

    It's my personal opinion that SRR would beat Mayweather; I just think he was THAT good and I don't think the athletics are so massively apart that it'd swing the other way. But that's just my opinion.

    This is an intriguing thread so I hope it generates some sensible and calculated responses...:good
     
  11. carrotlad

    carrotlad Member Full Member

    160
    2
    Jul 11, 2011
    I think it's a really interesting post.

    One could argue that, by fighting as often as he did, SRR wad able to practise his craft more regularly and thus garner more experience. This, combined with his fearsome KO power, accuracy and timing allowed him to dominate his era.

    However, on average I would aruge his victims were far less talented and skills in relation to him. Moreover, I believe that a more generalised style of boxing peresisted in that time compared to modern boxing (experts, correct me if I'm wrong).

    Furthermore, I would also say that Floyd is a product of intelligent training and "cost-effective" fighting. Floyd will train for his specific opponent, not for himself (if you know what I mean). Nor will he "overextend" himself in a fight. This allows him to always be in the best shape to beat his opponent.

    That said, I personally feel that SRR would have a far better showing in modern boxing than Floyd would have in Ray's time. Why? I feel that with the routine Ray had, his success speaks volumes about his own talent. Despite being unable to train for opponents the same way modern boxers can, he still achieved one of the best resumes in boxing history. Had he been afforded the same treatment as modern boxers we might have seen an even better fighter. He would have been exposed to a wider variation of styles and we would have seem him tested in a greater scope.

    Just my 2 cents
     
  12. Cap10Kirk

    Cap10Kirk Active Member Full Member

    702
    127
    Jan 20, 2015
    I believe SRR was a serpreme athlete. He was like Lebron James, bigger, stronger, faster than his opponents. Especially at 147. I'm a big Mayweather fan, SRR stops him.
     
  13. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    :good They don't make them like SRR no more. They definitely seem tougher before. Now we have fringe contender level pansies like Leo Santa Cruz prancing around ducking everyone.
    I think SRR's athletic tools at his disposal were not sufficient enough for a modern fast twitch monster like Mayweather who primes himself mentally, physically and tactically for a fight.

    Some fighters have a good gas tank, some don't, but the new fighters express athleticism more than old timers - especially because they know it's a 12 round fight and not 15, thus the pacing issues don't arise.

    Yeah, people usually don't question stuff, and let it fly under the radar.
     
  14. Enigmadanks

    Enigmadanks Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,744
    975
    Feb 5, 2009
    I don't like the idea of H2H matchups where one guy is in his 4th weight class and the other guy is campaigning in his original class.

    Makes no sense to try to hypothesize a FLoyd vs Robinson or Leonard or Hearns fight. Those men started at 147 and worked there way up to 175 lbs. Floyd started at 130 and moved up to 47/54.

    It's essentially asking how would Ray leonard or Robinson do against a prime ATG LHW?