Nothing wrong with that score. No need to fight me over the verdict. I didn't have a problem with the draw, but I understand you and many others are passionate that Castaño won. That's fine, I'm not saying you're wrong but at the time don't try to troll me and tell me that your score is the only reasonable score. This is boxing and there were several close rounds that could swing 8-4 to 6-6.
Funny guy CJ. Though surely you didn't agree with that bogus penalty against Denmark. Wasn't that one thing we actually agreed on? As far as boxing, we don't have to agree on scoring. I'll even throw you a bone - The 117-111, sure that was suspicious. That judge may have been "corrupt" OK. But the overall result was fair, and that's what's important. Life is about compromise CJ. Our scores and views of everything aren't going to line up perfectly, but the key is to find areas that we can agree on and respect our differences. Not try to make each other seem crazy for having a different view of a match.
Castano was the ring general and far more affective, hands down. Are you the Leader of the Support boxing robberies Union?
Fell asleep this morning and just watched this fight twice either side of dinner. In my eyes this was a ROBBERY 8-4 for Castano and not even debatable in my opinion I gave Charlo 2 10 11 and 12, and to be honest 11 and 12 were close Charlo looked to be in survival mode every time he got tagged If they rematch and Castano puts in more bodywork in the early rounds he can stop him.
You see this differently than me. You speak in generalities, as if who the ring general is doesn't change every round. In the rounds where Charlo worked behind the jab, like in rounds 5 and 6, Charlo was the ring general. In round 4, Charlo's body language wasn't the same, he didn't take control of that round like he did 5 and 6. Castaño showcased effective aggression in round 4, it was a very different story than rounds 5 and 6. Look you might never agree with me, but do go back and watch rounds 4-6 the difference is pretty noticeable, even you can recognize this.
Where have i said mine is the only reasonable one? I just think your pretty lousy at scoeing after reading your breakdowns Anyhow tata for now
These are the same people in the shadows trying to steal the WBC belt back off Fury Fury was smart to delay and stir the pot.
Cool your jets. No agenda here. Just watched a great fight and would like to see a rematch. If I don't call it a robbery, that means I have an agenda? How about those that claim it was a robbery? Is that not an agenda also?
Oh then where was that when the WBC was trying to steal the belt off of Canelo trying to rush him into a fight with GGG? So Fury is smart delaying against the corrupt WBC but when Canelo vacated the WBC belt that was so terribly cowardly?
yeah. In the same U.K still a lot of highly touted boxers weren't white. From current eddie prospects: Okolie, Buatsi, A.J aren't white, then there were Haye, Lewis, Benn, Eubank Sr etc . Now looks that will be Benn Jr. In pro boxing in U.K looks that skin color is not problem.
Race isn't the be all and end all in the UK, unlike the US. We support who we like, not just whoever represents whichever "community" we identify with the most. But the media is doing a great job in trying to change this and stoke up racial tensions here right now.