The Popular Perception and Legacy of David Tua

You continually write ****, and obviously have the brain of a gnat.

I have never offered any criticism, or hatred of David Tua.

I merely pointed out the idiocy of the opening post, by quoting from an interview given by Tua 17 years ago in which he says he was introduced to boxing at the age of 8 by his father, as were his 4 brothers, then 3 years later began SPARRING grown men.

Now in the real world 8 and 3 makes 11. What it adds up to in the Walter Mitty world that you and the other fool SKS inhabit is of no interest to me at all.

He also said that he never entered a boxing gym until he was 13 in the SAME interview.

Now compare that to the following **** written in the OP.

"The very first time David Tua laced on a pair of gloves to box was as a scared 8 year old little boy looking up at a grown man who was 3 times older than him and the grown man was specifically told NOT to take it easy on the little Tua even if he is a little kid."

However, with you being the dickhead that claims VK / Haye was more skillful than Ali / Frazier 1, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if you were stupid enough to fall for the more sensationalist version.

 

Your opinion of me ( or anything else for that matter ) means squat, as far as I'm concerned.

I am not moronic enough, to post, or indeed believe something like

" The first time Tua laced a pair of gloves was as a scared 8 year old kid looking up at a grown man 3 times his age, who was told NOT to go easy on him."

Then the fool compounds his idiocy, by coming out with **** about Western Samoans being a warrior breed.:roll::roll:

Yeah, yeah, some fvcking warrior beating up an 8 year old boy. Or are we to believe it was a tourist doing the beating?:rofl:rofl

You wrote.

You THRIVE on sensationalising an entire era and a vast array of boxers.

Erm, actually it was 3. SRR, Ali, and Frazier.

Have you even got a fvcking clue what irony is?