1974 to 1978. Muhammad Ali, Carlos Monzon and Roberto Duran was the reigning heavyweight, middleweight and lightweight champs during those years. Holy ****! These ATG's being champs at the same time can't be topped, too bad Sugar Ray Robinson couldn't have been welter champ during those years, that would have made it perfect.
20's-40's were golden (hell, you could go back to the turn of the century, really), there was a dip in quality in the 50's (old breed dying out, new breed making its way), and the 60's-80's were golden. The 90's were good, but a drop off in class (Heavyweights aside) from the 80's, and the 2000's have dropped off even further the more it's gone along.
Very good.....but the Golden Age of WW was the 30´s: 1935-39... -Armstrong -Holman Williams -Charley Burley -Barney Ross -Jimmy McLarnin -Ceferino Garcia -Fritzie Zivic -Kid Azteca
I think the 80s were good, Tyson at heavyweight, Holyfield at Cruiserweight, throw in Duran, hearns, Leonard and Hagler amongst others
D 1980s & 1990s were as good as d 1970s . D "olden age" was from about d end of WW2 until d early 2000s & including . And there were scatters of goodness in earlier times as well but those were by no means "golden ages" , they were eras of exhibitions , short fights , fixed fights , lousy level overall , foul play just like any other time . Regarding d early 2000s : Delahoya , Quartey , Mosley , Tszyu , Pacquiao , Marquez , Ronald Wright , Vitali Klitschko , Wladimir Klitschko , Lennox Lewis , David Tua , Corrie Sanders , Chris Byrd , Orlin Norris and more during that time . Only d 160lbs division was **** , but it's only 1 division . I think that @ every potential "golden" age there can b found a **** division or 2 .
I can't objectively deny the 1930s-40s being the true Golden Era, but I do feel the 70s/80s can stand up as a proud and truly great era with some top tier ATGs division-by-division: * Muhammad Ali * Roberto Duran * Carlos Monzon * Jose Napoles * Ray Leonard * Thomas Hearns * Alexis Arguello * Salvador Sanchez * Carlos Zarate * Wilfredo Gomez * Miguel Canto * Marvin Hagler * Michael Spinks * Julio Cesar Chavez * Wilfred Benitez * Emile Griffith * Aaron Pryor * George Foreman * Joe Frazier * Larry Holmes * Mike Tyson * Carlos Palomino * Ken Buchanon On and on.. Choosing a Lord for each, I'd agree with most of Cox's picks. Heavyweight: Ali 175: Spinks 160: Monzon or Hagler 154: Hearns 147: Leonard 140: Pryor 135: Duran 130: Arguello 126: Sanchez 122: Gomez 118: Zarate 112: Canto What you wanna do?
Apart from the fact that most of the fighters got robbed blind by the mafia I'd say the late 40s was the golden era for non-heavyweight boxing. Charles Marshall Williams Lamotta Zale Burley Graziano Robinson Zivic Bratton Cerdan ike Williams Beau jack Montgomery Armstrong Jenkins It was an amazing era. For the big men the 70s will never be bettered
good fighters, but how many could beat ali, monzon and duran in their relative weight classes? BTW-Don't assume Robinson automatically beats Monzon. (Remember, Monzon's unbeaten streak was very similar to Robinsons longest unbeaten streak..80 and 90)
Single fighters dont define eras. It's the depth of the divisions, quality and activity that they fought in which define the era.