The real golden age of boxing

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MMJoe, Dec 20, 2011.


  1. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    1974 to 1978.

    Muhammad Ali, Carlos Monzon and Roberto Duran was the reigning heavyweight, middleweight and lightweight champs during those years. Holy ****! These ATG's being champs at the same time can't be topped, too bad Sugar Ray Robinson couldn't have been welter champ during those years, that would have made it perfect.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,071
    21,589
    Sep 15, 2009
    After 76 ali was a paper champ imo.

    Golden age of boxing was 30's & 40's.
     
  3. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    20's-40's were golden (hell, you could go back to the turn of the century, really), there was a dip in quality in the 50's (old breed dying out, new breed making its way), and the 60's-80's were golden. The 90's were good, but a drop off in class (Heavyweights aside) from the 80's, and the 2000's have dropped off even further the more it's gone along.
     
  4. TAC602

    TAC602 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    6
    Oct 3, 2011
    :thumbsup
     
  5. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    because?
     
  6. TAC602

    TAC602 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    6
    Oct 3, 2011
    How about the Welterweight division from 1977-82? Palomino, Leonard, Duran, Hearns, Cuevas, Benitez.
     
  7. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    yes, i agree that was the golden age of THE WELTERWEIGHTS
     
  8. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,790
    5,157
    Aug 19, 2010
    Golden Age was 40´s and 80´s in my opinion....
     
  9. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,790
    5,157
    Aug 19, 2010
    Very good.....but the Golden Age of WW was the 30´s:
    1935-39...

    -Armstrong
    -Holman Williams
    -Charley Burley
    -Barney Ross
    -Jimmy McLarnin
    -Ceferino Garcia
    -Fritzie Zivic
    -Kid Azteca
     
  10. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    I think the 80s were good, Tyson at heavyweight, Holyfield at Cruiserweight, throw in Duran, hearns, Leonard and Hagler amongst others
     
  11. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    D 1980s & 1990s were as good as d 1970s .
    D "olden age" was from about d end of WW2 until d early 2000s & including . And there were scatters of goodness in earlier times as well but those were by no means "golden ages" , they were eras of exhibitions , short fights , fixed fights , lousy level overall , foul play just like any other time .
    Regarding d early 2000s :
    Delahoya , Quartey , Mosley , Tszyu , Pacquiao , Marquez , Ronald Wright , Vitali Klitschko , Wladimir Klitschko , Lennox Lewis , David Tua , Corrie Sanders , Chris Byrd , Orlin Norris and more during that time .
    Only d 160lbs division was **** , but it's only 1 division .
    I think that @ every potential "golden" age there can b found a **** division or 2 .
     
  12. TAC602

    TAC602 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    6
    Oct 3, 2011
    I can't objectively deny the 1930s-40s being the true Golden Era, but I do feel the 70s/80s can stand up as a proud and truly great era with some top tier ATGs division-by-division:

    * Muhammad Ali
    * Roberto Duran
    * Carlos Monzon
    * Jose Napoles
    * Ray Leonard
    * Thomas Hearns
    * Alexis Arguello
    * Salvador Sanchez
    * Carlos Zarate
    * Wilfredo Gomez
    * Miguel Canto
    * Marvin Hagler
    * Michael Spinks
    * Julio Cesar Chavez
    * Wilfred Benitez
    * Emile Griffith
    * Aaron Pryor
    * George Foreman
    * Joe Frazier
    * Larry Holmes
    * Mike Tyson
    * Carlos Palomino
    * Ken Buchanon

    On and on.. Choosing a Lord for each, I'd agree with most of Cox's picks.

    Heavyweight: Ali
    175: Spinks
    160: Monzon or Hagler
    154: Hearns
    147: Leonard
    140: Pryor
    135: Duran
    130: Arguello
    126: Sanchez
    122: Gomez
    118: Zarate
    112: Canto

    What you wanna do?
     
  13. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,250
    Feb 6, 2009
    Apart from the fact that most of the fighters got robbed blind by the mafia I'd say the late 40s was the golden era for non-heavyweight boxing.
    Charles
    Marshall
    Williams
    Lamotta
    Zale
    Burley
    Graziano
    Robinson
    Zivic
    Bratton
    Cerdan
    ike Williams
    Beau jack
    Montgomery
    Armstrong
    Jenkins
    It was an amazing era. For the big men the 70s will never be bettered
     
  14. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    good fighters, but how many could beat ali, monzon and duran in their relative weight classes?
    BTW-Don't assume Robinson automatically beats Monzon.
    (Remember, Monzon's unbeaten streak was very similar to Robinsons longest unbeaten streak..80 and 90)
     
  15. Bugger

    Bugger Active Member Full Member

    1,488
    5
    Nov 26, 2010

    Single fighters dont define eras. It's the depth of the divisions, quality and activity that they fought in which define the era.