The reality of Crawford's victory over Canelo explained in one minute

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MidniteProwler, Sep 23, 2025 at 4:34 PM.


  1. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,138
    28,428
    Sep 19, 2012
    I did not read the comments on the video. I have in the past seen a lot of ignorant casual comments on youtube videos. I find that the people that post here are a lot more knowledgeable when it comes to boxing. Canelo has been on the slide since losing to Bivol and he has a lot more wear and tear than Crawford despite being younger.

    It is a good win for Crawford and I agree he was Canelo's toughest opponent since Bivol the bookies also reflected this having Bud at 2 to1 when most Canelo opponents since Bivol have been at least 6 to 1 and more. So I think the win is overrated and should not place him above Usyk as the best fighter in the world. I do not think it was a good effort from Canelo there was no desperation from him at all.
    Like I said I think that Mario Lopez is 100% correct Canelo looked old and tired.
     
  2. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,245
    131,486
    Jul 21, 2009
    Crawford is chronologically older but Clenelo is clearly older in boxing years and Crawford has a lot more left than him. It's one of the main reasons I picked Crawford to win, along with the big size disparity being a complete myth, Crawford's much longer reach, and Clenelo not being able to deal with certain style.

    The fact so many, even if they were still in the minority, were picking Crawford despite him jumping up 2 weights had a lot to do with how Clenelo has looked in recent years, going on a four year KO drought against cherrypicks, and people realizing the big size disparity was a complete myth after seeing how big Crawford was and in particular compared to Clenelo during the pre-fight H2Hs

    SMW is a very weak division but I would put money on Iglesias not only beating Clenelo and Crawford but stopping them
     
    MidniteProwler and Rumsfeld like this.
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,536
    15,989
    Jul 19, 2004
    Sounds to me as if you're simply trying to downplay the fact that Bud is the only active fighter with 2 victories against fellow Top 5-6(ish) P4P guys in recent years. I personally don't think there is much separating Crawford, Usyk, or Inoue. I do not believe we have had a clear unanimous P4P King since Floyd, it's always been more debatable with a lesser degree of consensus since his retirement. However, it's worth noting that both Ring Magazine and TBRB currenly list Crawford as the #1 P4P boxer in the world.
     
    Pimp C likes this.
  4. MorvidusStyle

    MorvidusStyle Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,684
    6,014
    Jul 11, 2017
    The truth is that Canelo has declined and is definitely not what he was years ago.
    Ironically he's around the same age that GGG was when they fought and when people tried to deny that he was past prime.

    It's true Bud is older than him so he is also past prime. But some fighters decline earlier than others. The most shocking example of that was Degale, who was gone at 33 and got beaten up by Eubank Jr. who took the fight because he knew Degale was gone (the Truax fights).
    So imagine Canelo at 33 takes that Degale fight. People will say they are the same age, what's the problem. Problem is Degale is shot to hell.

    Canelo isn't as shot as Degale was, but it's a factor that he has dropped quite a bit and does take the shine off Bud's win if you're being honest. Bud being older swings it back a little, but it's hard to escape the fact Canelo isn't the same.

    As for the size difference, jumping weight classes, this is a manipulation from the Bud fandom. It's obvious they are roughly the same size naturally, even Bud admits that. Canelo is not a natural 168'r and neither is Bud. Both were huge drainers and Canelo just bulked up more. People are pretending Bud went up and fought Kessler or Ward at 168. Those guys would dwarf him. And Bud would never fight them for that reason.

    The size difference is more like Brook and Golovkin, who fought in difference weight classes but came in the ring the same weight and looking pretty close. Brook was a massive drainer and really a 154 fighter. Golovkin was an average/smallish MW and could have gone to 154 if he wanted. I mean Andy Lee did. Golovkin could also have bulked like Canelo and gone up to 168 or more. Then we could say Brook went up from welter to 175 and how amazing that was etc. In reality, just use your eyes and you can see they're close in size.
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,536
    15,989
    Jul 19, 2004
    Canelo may have more mileage, but doesn't change the fact that the deck was still heavily stacked in his favor. And I know you have been consistent in your claims that Crawford is this huge big guy, but the fact remains, prior to Canelo, the biggest guy he had ever hit or been hit by was Madrimov.

    Fair enough.

    There were a lot of people predicting a Crawford victory. I wans't one of them. But he was still a clear underdog going in, and beating his second highly rated P4P opponent in his last 3 fights is an admirable and praiseworthy feat.

    As far as Iglesias goes, maybe he could have also beaten, and perhaps stopped Canelo. But you're furthering my greater point here if he's the only name below 175 you think would beat the version of Canelo that Bud just beat.
     
    Serge likes this.
  6. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,138
    28,428
    Sep 19, 2012
    Yes I am down playing it but that is what I believe. From what I saw there is no way Canelo or Spence were anywhere near close to their best when they fought Crawford. I have disagreed with Ring Magazine's ranking for a very long time.
     
  7. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,536
    15,989
    Jul 19, 2004
    Of course you have.

    :lol:
     
  8. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,138
    28,428
    Sep 19, 2012
    That is because I think that Usyk and Loma are the first stand out P4P talents since Mayweather and Pacquiao.
     
  9. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,140
    9,872
    Aug 1, 2012
    How decisive was it in your view? How did you score it? And more importantly, how would you see a rematch? Do you think Canelo showed Crawford too much respect? Or was it just a case of Canelo having stamina issues in the later stages? It seems that most on here had Canelo doing well over the first 5 rounds, winning many of those rounds, but over the last 7 Crawford was the better. The issue for Canelo it seems wasn't the body punching, but the inability to land to the head of Crawford with eye catching shots.

    The one thing that puzzles me is the lack of urgency from Canelo's corner in the late rounds. Slightly more offense from Canelo in either the 11th or the 12th could have caused a draw and he would still have his titles. Should Canelo have pushed harder in the Champinship rounds? Where was the urgency?
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  10. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,536
    15,989
    Jul 19, 2004
    I scored it 116-112, and I did think it was competitive throughout much of the fight. I think Canelo was giving it his best in the 11th and 12th, even if he was a bit unimaginative. I just think Bud was a much better conditioned athlete in this one.

    This was my post fight review if you are interested, shadow. :thumbsup:

    This content is protected
     
    shadow111 likes this.
  11. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,138
    28,428
    Sep 19, 2012
    I am not denying any of this so not sure what the problem is? I am agreeing with Mario Lopez that Canelo look tired and slow. Several steps below what he once was. Crawford won fair and square but I do not think it was some incredible performance.
     
  12. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,245
    131,486
    Jul 21, 2009
    I'm not sure I agree on the deck being heavily stacked in Clenelo's favour. It was in the US, with a US ref and 3 US judges, with 2 known massive Crawford fanboys doing commentary, 1 of whom a notorious Clenelo hater. Don't get me wrong, obviously A side privilege, a stacked deck, and corrupt judging are as synonymous with Clenelo as ginger hair but I don't think it was necessarily the case this time.

    This is true but by the same token Crawford weighed more than career 154 Madrimov and the weight difference between him and Clenelo, if there even was one that is, would've been a few pounds IMO and I believe Crawford's longer reach was a much bigger factor. This version of Clenelo slings big overhand singles and you can see them coming, especially an elite fighter like Crawford who is faster and due to his longer reach is able to fight at a range outside of Clenelo's and was able to see them coming and evade or block them easily

    As said it was an excellent win and Crawford is a great fighter but it was also a very favourable stylistic match up for him vs a version of Clenelo who has declined a lot in recent years. I was very confident of Crawford winning and it wouldn't have been that way if Clenelo had still been in his prime and was still knocking guys out.

    Look at how other fighters have subsequently dealt with those cherrypicks Clenelo was unable to get out of there or struggled against, fighters who are far from elite.

    Sheeraz knocking out Berlangy in his 168 debut

    Complete featherfist Surace one punch icing Mung out

    Mung bouncing Juan Ryder off the canvas like a yoyo and stopping him

    Shishkin hurting Scull badly with a jab and almost getting him out of there

    Plant getting dropped, and hurt multiple times by McCumby and almost getting stopped by him early.



    No, Iglesias is just one fighter I not only believe would beat both I believe he stops both and neither will go anywhere near him


    As said, 168 is a graveyard division and so is 160 and both have been for years. That's why there aren't too many names we can think of. They are absolute wasteland divisions at the moment but Iglesias, Janibek, Sheeraz, Mbilli, Martinez, Bek the Bully are some of the top of my head who I think could beat this version of Clenelo or I would give a decent chance and there are a few prospects at 160 who look promising but they've not had many fights yet
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,536
    15,989
    Jul 19, 2004
    Fair enough. Everyone has their own opinions!

    I do find it more than a bit bizarre that anyone would place Lomachenko on the same level as someone truly elite like Usyk. Usyk is clearly on a higher level than him, as are others in the post-Floyd era. But again, that's just my opinion.
     
    MidniteProwler likes this.
  14. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,777
    16,818
    Jan 13, 2021
    Canelo gassed against GGG, Ryder and Bivol too. This was the same exact Canelo that beat undisputed 154lb champion Charlo into a pulp. That is exactly how you said the fight would go except Crawford would get KO'd while "exchanging". That's not what happened because Crawford is leagues above Charlo.
     
    Pimp C, drenlou, Silver and 1 other person like this.
  15. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,138
    28,428
    Sep 19, 2012
    I think that Loma is one of the most underrated fighters in recent times and easily one of the most talented I have seen in my life time. I believe that Loma could have achieved a lot more than he did even though he did achieve a lot. His amateur career alone was amazing.