the reason why paulie lost

Khan is, in my opinion, the better fighter anyway, but Paulie's defence was almost inexistant last night. He was way too easy to hit, and didn't seem to want to do anything about it.

 

Khan simply outgunned Paulie. If only Paulie has some decent pop in his punches, the outcome might have been different.

 

Khans Jab

 

Nonsense. Paulie's entire career isn't based on landing one punch to KO anyone you think he will do it in this fight?, seriously. Khan just out-landed him, was faster than him, had the power to hurt him and just kept him confused and not able to attack as he wishes. The same happened against Hatton, once he's nailed hard and gets a reality check early then he will fight confused and nervous losing every minute of every round till the end.

 

He has no power.

 

Bad style matchup for Paulie put simply. Khan looks the same to me, strengths and weaknesses. He has very fast hands, throws well in bunches and uses his height and reach well, but he is very upright and rigid to me, he isn't fluid at all. He will always beat fighters that he can physically bully and always have trouble with a strong swarmer or boxer puncher. I think he is a good figter and can see him doing well, but he is very vulnerable.

 

Didn't he land like 40% of his punches that pretty good accuracy I however don't know what percentage of them was jabs