The reason why so many Pav fans are so obsessed with Paul Williams...

But I agree with you...

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRREO4lj5D0[/ame]

 

Unfair or robbery would be if the wrong fighter won the fight.

If a judge scores the fight for the right fighter, but too lopsided of a victory, I wouldn't exactly call that a robbery. Because any of those scores would have been the "deciding one"


So would you say that Clottey was robbed against Cotto, since the "deciding scorecard" had Cotto like 117-111 or some bull**** like that? Not to mention Clottey actually had one judge that scored the fight in his favor.

 

The "deciding judge"?????


What the **** are you talking about? He is no more of the "deciding judge" than the other one who voted it 115-113 for Williams. Even if you throw his score out, you have one judge for Williams and one judge a draw.

 

Many of them don't. You are correct.


But only the hardcore dickheads like Farmboxer and his type are the only ones who think it was a complete robbery. Most people (even those who aren't Williams fans) feel like it could have been a draw....

IF the overwhelming majority of people think a fight could have been a draw, then either fighter walking away could not be considered a robbery.

And a lot of people were overreacting to the obviously skewed scoredcard.